In this extensive revision of his classic guide, Stanley Brodsky, joined by coauthor Thomas Gutheil, continues to educate and entertain mental health professionals who are called as expert witnesses, teaching them simple, effective strategies for direct and cross-examination.
In this extensive revision of his classic guide, Stanley Brodsky, joined by coauthor Thomas Gutheil, continues to educate and entertain mental health professionals who are called as expert witnesses, teaching them simple, effective strategies for direct and cross-examination.
Preface Introduction 1. Apologies 2. Arbitrary Pigeonholes 3. Asked and Answered 4. Boundaries Between Expert Witness Roles and Trial Consultation 5. Confabulations 6. Consistent Experts 7. Context 8. Directed Feedback 9. Discovery and Discoveries 10. Ethics in Expert Testimony 11. Evasive Responses: Hopeless But Not Serious 12. Experience Does Not Count 13. Expert Witness as Master Teacher 14. Fact Witnesses 15. Frames of Reference 16. Gender-Intrusive Questions 17. Gotcha and Goodbye 18. Holy Mackerel, Man! 19. Illusory Documentation 20. Integrity Checks 21. Language: It's a Virus 22. Lawyer Bashing and Lawyer Jokes 23. Le Mot Juste 24. Lost and Befuddled 25. Low Pitches 26. Metatestimony 27. Offensive Language 28. Offensive Questions 29. Personal Attacks: Overview 30. Personal Attacks: Demeaning Attorneys 31. Personal Attacks: Internet Vulnerabilities 32. Personal Attacks: Taints 33. Pulling and the Push–Pull 34. Real and Apparent Ambiguities 35. Recording of Assessments 36. Sayonara Solutions 37. Silent Treatments 38. Sleight of Hand 39. Social Construction of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Dangerousness 40. Spontaneity and Alertness on the Stand 41. Swoop and Perch 42. Telephoned and Videorecorded Testimony 43. Thank You, Thank You, Thank You 44. Their Words in Our Mouths 45. Tightrope Walking 46. To Faint, To Weep, To Blank Out 47. Traps of Common Sense 48. True Grit and False 49. Ultimate Opinion Testimony 50. Well Beyond Testimony 51. What We Like to See in an Expert Witness — And What We Don't Suggested Readings: More of This References Index About the Authors
Preface Introduction 1. Apologies 2. Arbitrary Pigeonholes 3. Asked and Answered 4. Boundaries Between Expert Witness Roles and Trial Consultation 5. Confabulations 6. Consistent Experts 7. Context 8. Directed Feedback 9. Discovery and Discoveries 10. Ethics in Expert Testimony 11. Evasive Responses: Hopeless But Not Serious 12. Experience Does Not Count 13. Expert Witness as Master Teacher 14. Fact Witnesses 15. Frames of Reference 16. Gender-Intrusive Questions 17. Gotcha and Goodbye 18. Holy Mackerel, Man! 19. Illusory Documentation 20. Integrity Checks 21. Language: It's a Virus 22. Lawyer Bashing and Lawyer Jokes 23. Le Mot Juste 24. Lost and Befuddled 25. Low Pitches 26. Metatestimony 27. Offensive Language 28. Offensive Questions 29. Personal Attacks: Overview 30. Personal Attacks: Demeaning Attorneys 31. Personal Attacks: Internet Vulnerabilities 32. Personal Attacks: Taints 33. Pulling and the Push–Pull 34. Real and Apparent Ambiguities 35. Recording of Assessments 36. Sayonara Solutions 37. Silent Treatments 38. Sleight of Hand 39. Social Construction of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Dangerousness 40. Spontaneity and Alertness on the Stand 41. Swoop and Perch 42. Telephoned and Videorecorded Testimony 43. Thank You, Thank You, Thank You 44. Their Words in Our Mouths 45. Tightrope Walking 46. To Faint, To Weep, To Blank Out 47. Traps of Common Sense 48. True Grit and False 49. Ultimate Opinion Testimony 50. Well Beyond Testimony 51. What We Like to See in an Expert Witness — And What We Don't Suggested Readings: More of This References Index About the Authors
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309
