Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Psychology Research Companion]( "The Psychology Research Companion")
The Psychology Research Companion202,99 €![An Introduction To the Logic of Psychological Measurement]( "An Introduction To the Logic of Psychological Measurement")
An Introduction To the Logic of Psychological Measurement202,99 €![Research for the Public Good: Applying the Methods of Translational Research to Improve Human Health and Well-Being]( "Research for the Public Good: Applying the Methods of Translational Research to Improve Human Health and Well-Being")
Research for the Public Good: Applying the Methods of Translational Research to Improve Human Health and Well-Being71,99 €![The Use of Personal Documents in Psychological Science]( "The Use of Personal Documents in Psychological Science")
The Use of Personal Documents in Psychological Science37,99 €![The Elements of Inquiry]( "The Elements of Inquiry")
The Elements of Inquiry202,99 €![Modeling Dyadic and Interdependent Data in the Developmental and Behavioral Sciences]( "Modeling Dyadic and Interdependent Data in the Developmental and Behavioral Sciences")
Modeling Dyadic and Interdependent Data in the Developmental and Behavioral Sciences202,99 €![Longitudinal Models in the Behavioral and Related Sciences]( "Longitudinal Models in the Behavioral and Related Sciences")
Longitudinal Models in the Behavioral and Related Sciences223,99 €
This book is a wake-up call for those who contend that the peer review system for journal publications works. It supports the current groundswell of dissatisfaction with peer review. Harcum and Rosen challenge the notion of simple biases of researchers and argue that many reviews are simply incompetent. The biases against new scientific approaches and philosophies are exacerbated if proposed by unknown researchers or if contrary to the established research stars. The authors also destroy the myth of the appeal system as a forum whereby peers can debate scientific issues. The primary purpose of this work is to raise the consciousness of the scientific community, particularly psychologists, about serious flaws in peer review. The authors demonstrate in a dramatic way how poor the system really is, and propose a critical change--the institution of a viable system for appeals.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.