Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![A Comparative Case Study of the Impact of Standards on Instruction]( "A Comparative Case Study of the Impact of Standards on Instruction")
A Comparative Case Study of the Impact of Standards on Instruction44,99 €![The Impact of using Task-based Reading Activities on Reading Skill]( "The Impact of using Task-based Reading Activities on Reading Skill")
The Impact of using Task-based Reading Activities on Reading Skill32,99 €![EFL Learners L1 Conceptual Transfer]( "EFL Learners L1 Conceptual Transfer")
EFL Learners L1 Conceptual Transfer51,99 €![Opportunities and Challenges of Using Shinashigna for Instruction]( "Opportunities and Challenges of Using Shinashigna for Instruction")
Opportunities and Challenges of Using Shinashigna for Instruction44,99 €![Using Generic EFL Materials Outside English-Speaking Countries]( "Using Generic EFL Materials Outside English-Speaking Countries")
Using Generic EFL Materials Outside English-Speaking Countries38,99 €![Exploring Chinese EFL Teachers' Knowledge of Vocabulary Instruction]( "Exploring Chinese EFL Teachers' Knowledge of Vocabulary Instruction")
Exploring Chinese EFL Teachers' Knowledge of Vocabulary Instruction27,99 €![Implementing Differentiated Instruction in an Armenian EFL Setting]( "Implementing Differentiated Instruction in an Armenian EFL Setting")
Implementing Differentiated Instruction in an Armenian EFL Setting32,99 €
The question whether or not the students' mother tongue (L1) should be used in the EFL classroom has been an important issue for a long time. However, there seems to be no consensus on the issue as yet. Supporters of the Monolingual Approach claim that L2 can be learnt only through L2, whereas the proponents of the Bilingual Approach believe that L1 has a facilitating role in many aspects of language instruction. To shed some light on the issue, this was designed to investigate the effect of using first language in the Armenian EFL class. The qualitative data for this project was collected by administering two questionnaires to 99 students and 12 teachers, intended to explore Armenian students' and teachers' attitudes towards the use of L1. The quantitative data was collected by conducting a pretest-posttest intact group design in two classes at AUA's Experimental English classes.