Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Perspectives of Country's Economy]( "Perspectives of Country's Economy")
Perspectives of Country's Economy26,99 €![Impact of Corruption on a Country's Fiscal Variables]( "Impact of Corruption on a Country's Fiscal Variables")
Impact of Corruption on a Country's Fiscal Variables40,99 €![The institutional and political economy of the European fiscal rules]( "The institutional and political economy of the European fiscal rules")
The institutional and political economy of the European fiscal rules27,99 €![Institutional Dimension of Payments for Environmental Services]( "Institutional Dimension of Payments for Environmental Services")
Institutional Dimension of Payments for Environmental Services44,99 €![The Influence of Industry Structure on Performance]( "The Influence of Industry Structure on Performance")
The Influence of Industry Structure on Performance51,99 €![The Influence of intangibe Assets on the Value of a Company]( "The Influence of intangibe Assets on the Value of a Company")
The Influence of intangibe Assets on the Value of a Company32,99 €![The influence of the sharing economy on changing consumer behaviour]( "The influence of the sharing economy on changing consumer behaviour")
The influence of the sharing economy on changing consumer behaviour26,99 €
The IMF has been playing a leading role in poverty
reduction activities. Its Poverty Reduction and
Growth Facility (PRGF) grogram provides resources to
low-income countries aiming to foster durable
growth, thereby raising living standards and
reducing poverty. Many developing countries have
participated in the program. But the results are not
always good. Some countries experienced painful
times with low growth gate and even depression.
Much debate has been made over the effects of IMF-
supported stability-oriented programs. A proper
standard for measuring the effectiveness is to
compare the macroeconomic outcomes under the program
with the outcomes that would have emerged in the
absence of the program. The difficulty lies in that
it is not possible to have both of the outcomes
because in reality, we can only have one experience.
In this study, we use a system dynamics national
model as a base and test its long-term behavior with
and without IMF s poverty reduction program. Base on
the simulation result, we can compare the two
outcomes, thus, study the long-term effect of IMF''s
poverty reduction program.
reduction activities. Its Poverty Reduction and
Growth Facility (PRGF) grogram provides resources to
low-income countries aiming to foster durable
growth, thereby raising living standards and
reducing poverty. Many developing countries have
participated in the program. But the results are not
always good. Some countries experienced painful
times with low growth gate and even depression.
Much debate has been made over the effects of IMF-
supported stability-oriented programs. A proper
standard for measuring the effectiveness is to
compare the macroeconomic outcomes under the program
with the outcomes that would have emerged in the
absence of the program. The difficulty lies in that
it is not possible to have both of the outcomes
because in reality, we can only have one experience.
In this study, we use a system dynamics national
model as a base and test its long-term behavior with
and without IMF s poverty reduction program. Base on
the simulation result, we can compare the two
outcomes, thus, study the long-term effect of IMF''s
poverty reduction program.