Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Approaching Inflection: The functional head analysis versus Word-and-Paradigm]( "Approaching Inflection: The functional head analysis versus Word-and-Paradigm")
Approaching Inflection: The functional head analysis versus Word-and-Paradigm17,95 €![650 Idioms and Proverbial Phrases in Modern Standard Arabic]( "650 Idioms and Proverbial Phrases in Modern Standard Arabic")
650 Idioms and Proverbial Phrases in Modern Standard Arabic195,99 €![Understanding Morphological Rules]( "Understanding Morphological Rules")
Understanding Morphological Rules74,99 €![Paradigm Structure and Predictability in Latin Inflection]( "Paradigm Structure and Predictability in Latin Inflection")
Paradigm Structure and Predictability in Latin Inflection81,99 €![Explorations in Nominal Inflection]( "Explorations in Nominal Inflection")
Explorations in Nominal Inflection137,99 €![The Scholar's Companion: Containing Exercises in the Orthography, Derivation and Classification of English Words]( "The Scholar's Companion: Containing Exercises in the Orthography, Derivation and Classification of English Words")
The Scholar's Companion: Containing Exercises in the Orthography, Derivation and Classification of English Words38,99 €![On Inflection]( "On Inflection")
On Inflection134,99 €
This study aims at contributing to a clarification of the distinction between derivational and inflectional morphology. Examples from dictionaries, lexicons and corpuses, were taken and analysed in order to find whether a certain morphological process belongs to the domain of inflection or derivation. Much of the data is taken from English and Modern Standard Arabic (MSA), with other data drawn from French, German and Dutch. The study consists of a morphological analysis of these languages based on two important phenomena in morphology, namely, concatenative morphology and non-concatenative morphology. Through qualitative analysis, inflection and derivation are shown to not be clear-cut categories in both English and MSA. There are no sharp boundaries between these two important areas despite the fact that researchers have been trying to differentiate between them. It is hoped that investigations for each criterion will help morphologists and other linguists to take into consideration the problematic interfaces that exist between these two main fields in morphology.