Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![THE COLLECTIVE DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACY IN THE AMERICAS WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE PRINCIPLE OF NON-INTERVENTION]( "THE COLLECTIVE DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACY IN THE AMERICAS WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE PRINCIPLE OF NON-INTERVENTION")
THE COLLECTIVE DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACY IN THE AMERICAS WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE PRINCIPLE OF NON-INTERVENTION20,99 €![The most important principle in SIVJRNR for a stable peace]( "The most important principle in SIVJRNR for a stable peace")
The most important principle in SIVJRNR for a stable peace26,99 €![Domestic law, abortion and contraception versus the Maputo Protocol]( "Domestic law, abortion and contraception versus the Maputo Protocol")
Domestic law, abortion and contraception versus the Maputo Protocol39,99 €![Principle of non-intervention in internal affairs]( "Principle of non-intervention in internal affairs")
Principle of non-intervention in internal affairs26,99 €![Principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples]( "Principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples")
Principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples26,99 €![The principle of common heritage of mankind in the new law of the sea: An African perspective based on Nasila S. Rembe¿s work]( "The principle of common heritage of mankind in the new law of the sea: An African perspective based on Nasila S. Rembe¿s work")
The principle of common heritage of mankind in the new law of the sea: An African perspective based on Nasila S. Rembe¿s work42,95 €![The Principle of Solidarity]( "The Principle of Solidarity")
The Principle of Solidarity110,99 €
What is the real impact of the principle of prior exhaustion of domestic remedies on international human rights litigation? This is the question that this study attempts to answer. This principle is generally put forward as a means of organising international human rights litigation, without regard for its effects on the situation of the individual. This way of presenting the rule seems simplistic, in that it leads to a focus on states and international human rights bodies, without serious consideration of the purpose of these bodies (the protection of the individual). The present work sheds light on these two somewhat contradictory aspects of the rule, thus revealing its ambivalent character, in reference to Janus, the Roman deity with two faces.