Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![A critical assessment of the role of directors in relation to takeovers of public companies]( "A critical assessment of the role of directors in relation to takeovers of public companies")
A critical assessment of the role of directors in relation to takeovers of public companies17,95 €![Social Justification of the Termination of Employment]( "Social Justification of the Termination of Employment")
Social Justification of the Termination of Employment15,95 €![The Urgent Need of an International Competition Law and Competition Authority in a Globalised World. A Call for Harmonization]( "The Urgent Need of an International Competition Law and Competition Authority in a Globalised World. A Call for Harmonization")
The Urgent Need of an International Competition Law and Competition Authority in a Globalised World. A Call for Harmonization16,95 €![The 1996 Arbitration and Conciliation Act with Amendments of 2015]( "The 1996 Arbitration and Conciliation Act with Amendments of 2015")
The 1996 Arbitration and Conciliation Act with Amendments of 201552,95 €![Critically assess the role of efficiencies in merger assessment]( "Critically assess the role of efficiencies in merger assessment")
Critically assess the role of efficiencies in merger assessment16,95 €![Right to Privacy and Protection of Personal Data of the worker]( "Right to Privacy and Protection of Personal Data of the worker")
Right to Privacy and Protection of Personal Data of the worker36,99 €![The Economic Assessment of Mergers Under European Competition Law]( "The Economic Assessment of Mergers Under European Competition Law")
The Economic Assessment of Mergers Under European Competition Law176,99 €
Essay from the year 2024 in the subject Law - Civil / Private, Trade, Anti Trust Law, Business Law, grade: 78.00, Queen Mary University of London, language: English, abstract: Hostile takeover bids and the options available to directors in responding to them continue to be a hotly debated issue, with different jurisdictions taking different approaches. Based on the historical experience in the UK of measures taken by target company directors to frustrate unwanted takeover bids and the economic theory of the "market for corporate control", the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers has included a rule strictly prohibiting the directors of a target company from taking any action that could frustrate a bid without the prior approval of shareholders. Recently, the Takeover Panel amended this rule for the first time. This essay examines the recent amendments and discusses whether this rule can be justified in the future.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.