Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Environmental Regime in India]( "The Environmental Regime in India")
The Environmental Regime in India39,99 €![Evaluating the U.S. Human Genome Project]( "Evaluating the U.S. Human Genome Project")
Evaluating the U.S. Human Genome Project44,99 €![The Process of Rule Implementation in Mexico]( "The Process of Rule Implementation in Mexico")
The Process of Rule Implementation in Mexico44,99 €![The Politics of Civil-Military Relations in Mexico]( "The Politics of Civil-Military Relations in Mexico")
The Politics of Civil-Military Relations in Mexico51,99 €![The Worldview of U.S. Intelligence]( "The Worldview of U.S. Intelligence")
The Worldview of U.S. Intelligence32,99 €![Policy Making and Electoral Politics in Mexico]( "Policy Making and Electoral Politics in Mexico")
Policy Making and Electoral Politics in Mexico32,99 €![COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS IN MEXICO]( "COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS IN MEXICO")
COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS IN MEXICO51,99 €
There is a long standing regime of border co-
operation between Mexico and the U.S. that was
transformed during the twentieth century into a
regime of international environmental management.
This analysis reviewed the Mexico-U.S. Environmental
Regime with particular focus on water resources.
This regime does not conform to realist accounts of
international relations when we look at the regime s
performance in the Rio Grande and the Colorado
River. First, there is no clear separation of
international and domestic as would be implied by
sovereignty thesis of neorealism. Instead there is a
system of multilevel governance combined with an
interactive decision-making process. Second, there
is not the successful assertion of self-interest
that neorealism would predict when we look at the
performance of the regime in terms of the
distribution of the water supplies between Mexican
and U.S. citizens. However, the regime is not
successful in environmental terms, that is, not
successful in addressing the underlying problems
related to water quality. Despite this performance,
the regime has largely performed well during the
period from 1960 to 1990.
operation between Mexico and the U.S. that was
transformed during the twentieth century into a
regime of international environmental management.
This analysis reviewed the Mexico-U.S. Environmental
Regime with particular focus on water resources.
This regime does not conform to realist accounts of
international relations when we look at the regime s
performance in the Rio Grande and the Colorado
River. First, there is no clear separation of
international and domestic as would be implied by
sovereignty thesis of neorealism. Instead there is a
system of multilevel governance combined with an
interactive decision-making process. Second, there
is not the successful assertion of self-interest
that neorealism would predict when we look at the
performance of the regime in terms of the
distribution of the water supplies between Mexican
and U.S. citizens. However, the regime is not
successful in environmental terms, that is, not
successful in addressing the underlying problems
related to water quality. Despite this performance,
the regime has largely performed well during the
period from 1960 to 1990.