Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Phantom Public]( "The Phantom Public")
The Phantom Public20,99 €![Phantom Menace or Looming Danger?]( "Phantom Menace or Looming Danger?")
Phantom Menace or Looming Danger?76,99 €![The Phantom Public]( "The Phantom Public")
The Phantom Public31,99 €![The Phantom Public]( "The Phantom Public")
The Phantom Public14,99 €![The Phantom of a Polarized America]( "The Phantom of a Polarized America")
The Phantom of a Polarized America109,99 €![The Changing Dynamics of U.S. Defense Spending]( "The Changing Dynamics of U.S. Defense Spending")
The Changing Dynamics of U.S. Defense Spending95,99 €![Military Organizations for Homeland Defense and Smaller-Scale Contingencies]( "Military Organizations for Homeland Defense and Smaller-Scale Contingencies")
Military Organizations for Homeland Defense and Smaller-Scale Contingencies62,99 €
While less exotic than some of the original "Star Wars" proposals, recent programmes have proven to be just as ineffectual. Land-based interceptors have repeatedly been deflected by cheap decoys, while sea-based systems cannot be deployed effectivly. In addition to such terminal and scientific difficulties, the entire development process has been warped by special-interest advocacy, fraud and abuse. Despite such fundamental problems, proponents of nationa missle defense forge ahead, driven by an antiquated view of the world as sovereign self-contained states rather than members of a global economy. Designed to stimulate interest and debate among the public and policy-makers, by providing solid facts and analysis. This guide combines scientific, geopolitical, historical and strategic analysis to critque the delusion of perfect national security.
In the past four decades, the United States has spent $85 billion pursuing the fantasy of an effective missile defense system to shield our nation against the threat of a nuclear attack. Recent public tests, while less exotic than some of the original Star Wars proposals, were spectacular failures and call into question the whole program's rationale. Neither the land-based system proposed by the Clinton administration, nor the alternatives proposed by earlier administrations, would ever work--regardless of how much R&D money is channeled into the project. Rather than enhancing national security, these doomed efforts would provoke a new arms race and alienate key allies. The authors apply their extensive insiders' expertise to argue that thoughtful diplomacy is the only real answer to meet America's national security goals. Like President Reagan with his Star Wars program, President Bush has again made national missile defense (NMD) a national priority at a cost which may exceed $150 billion in the next ten years. Defense experts Eisendrath, Goodman, and Marsh contend that recent tests give little confidence that any of the systems under consideration--land-based, boost-phase, or laser-driven--have any chance of effective deployment within decades. The interests of the military-industrial complex and the unilateralist views of the Bush administration are driving NMD, not a desire to promote national security. Rather than increase U.S. security, the plans of the current administration, if implemented, will erode it. NMD will heighten the threat from China and Russia, alienate key allies, and provoke a new arms race and the proliferation of nuclear weapons, all in response to a greatly exaggerated threat from so-called rogue states, such as North Korea and Iran. Thoughtful diplomacy, not a misguided foreign policy based on a hopeless dream of a Fortress America, is the real answer to meeting Americas security goals. Designed to stimulate interest and debate among the public and policy-makers, The Phantom Defense provides solid facts and combines scientific, geopolitical, historical, and strategic analysis to critique the delusion of national missile defense, while suggesting a more effective alternative.
In the past four decades, the United States has spent $85 billion pursuing the fantasy of an effective missile defense system to shield our nation against the threat of a nuclear attack. Recent public tests, while less exotic than some of the original Star Wars proposals, were spectacular failures and call into question the whole program's rationale. Neither the land-based system proposed by the Clinton administration, nor the alternatives proposed by earlier administrations, would ever work--regardless of how much R&D money is channeled into the project. Rather than enhancing national security, these doomed efforts would provoke a new arms race and alienate key allies. The authors apply their extensive insiders' expertise to argue that thoughtful diplomacy is the only real answer to meet America's national security goals. Like President Reagan with his Star Wars program, President Bush has again made national missile defense (NMD) a national priority at a cost which may exceed $150 billion in the next ten years. Defense experts Eisendrath, Goodman, and Marsh contend that recent tests give little confidence that any of the systems under consideration--land-based, boost-phase, or laser-driven--have any chance of effective deployment within decades. The interests of the military-industrial complex and the unilateralist views of the Bush administration are driving NMD, not a desire to promote national security. Rather than increase U.S. security, the plans of the current administration, if implemented, will erode it. NMD will heighten the threat from China and Russia, alienate key allies, and provoke a new arms race and the proliferation of nuclear weapons, all in response to a greatly exaggerated threat from so-called rogue states, such as North Korea and Iran. Thoughtful diplomacy, not a misguided foreign policy based on a hopeless dream of a Fortress America, is the real answer to meeting Americas security goals. Designed to stimulate interest and debate among the public and policy-makers, The Phantom Defense provides solid facts and combines scientific, geopolitical, historical, and strategic analysis to critique the delusion of national missile defense, while suggesting a more effective alternative.