Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Is the Bank Merger Wave of the 1990s Efficient?: Lessons from Nine Case Studies, Studies on Financial Market Deregulation (Aei Studies on Financial Ma]( "Is the Bank Merger Wave of the 1990s Efficient?: Lessons from Nine Case Studies, Studies on Financial Market Deregulation (Aei Studies on Financial Ma")
Is the Bank Merger Wave of the 1990s Efficient?: Lessons from Nine Case Studies, Studies on Financial Market Deregulation (Aei Studies on Financial Ma10,99 €![Insurance Deregulation and the Public Interest]( "Insurance Deregulation and the Public Interest")
Insurance Deregulation and the Public Interest10,99 €![U.S. Bank Deregulation in Historical Perspective]( "U.S. Bank Deregulation in Historical Perspective")
U.S. Bank Deregulation in Historical Perspective41,99 €![Nationalizing Mortgage Risk: The Growth of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac]( "Nationalizing Mortgage Risk: The Growth of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac")
Nationalizing Mortgage Risk: The Growth of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac10,99 €![Financing Social Security: A Conference Sponsored by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research (AEI Symposia 78-H)]( "Financing Social Security: A Conference Sponsored by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research (AEI Symposia 78-H)")
Financing Social Security: A Conference Sponsored by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research (AEI Symposia 78-H)17,99 €![An Analysis of Medical Savings Accounts: Do Two Wrongs Make a Right?: Do Two Wrongs Make a Right? (AEI Special Studies in Health Reform)]( "An Analysis of Medical Savings Accounts: Do Two Wrongs Make a Right?: Do Two Wrongs Make a Right? (AEI Special Studies in Health Reform)")
An Analysis of Medical Savings Accounts: Do Two Wrongs Make a Right?: Do Two Wrongs Make a Right? (AEI Special Studies in Health Reform)9,99 €![Tourism and the Less Developed World]( "Tourism and the Less Developed World")
Tourism and the Less Developed World93,99 €
Federal deposit insurance may be "the single most destabilizing influence in the financial system," says economist Charles W. Calomiris in a new study published by AEI. Market discipline provides a better bank safety net than government insurance, he concludes. The Postmodern Bank Safety Net: Lessons from Developed and Developing Economies shows how government deposit insurance subsidizes the risks taken by banks. Weak banks deliberately and sometimes with impunity take on greater risks than they can afford. Undue risk-taking would not be tolerated were private market discipline brought to bear on banks, Calomiris argues. Market discipline would place the regulatory burden on sophisticated market participants with their own money at stake-a bank would survive only if it had investors, and those investors would be willing to risk their money only if they were able to evaluate the bank's risk. Currently, banks that hide loan losses can avoid paying increased deposit insurance costs. At the same time, Calomiris says, government regulators lack strong incentive to determine the true risk characteristics of bank assets-government regulators do not have their own money at stake and they face political pressure to maintain the credit supply. The results can be calamitous. In the 1970s and 1980s the Farm Credit System was increasingly willing to lend against questionable collateral while private banks withdrew from the market as lending risk increased. The system failed, gripping U.S. farmers in a debt crisis. Similarly, the savings and loan failures and the oil-related bank collapses in Texas and Oklahoma of the 19080s can be attributed to the failure of the bank safety net. And Chile, Mexico, and Japan have suffered financial collapses because their governments protected banks from self-inflicted losses.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.