Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The framework agreement in public procurement law:]( "The framework agreement in public procurement law:")
The framework agreement in public procurement law:29,99 €![BROKEN: The Myth of Equity in American Jurisprudence]( "BROKEN: The Myth of Equity in American Jurisprudence")
BROKEN: The Myth of Equity in American Jurisprudence40,99 €![The Spanish XIX and its legal system]( "The Spanish XIX and its legal system")
The Spanish XIX and its legal system55,99 €![Evaluation of 1984 Mass Housing Law: Spatial Distribution of Housing Credits]( "Evaluation of 1984 Mass Housing Law: Spatial Distribution of Housing Credits")
Evaluation of 1984 Mass Housing Law: Spatial Distribution of Housing Credits42,99 €![The Responsibility of the State in the Control of Neglected Diseases]( "The Responsibility of the State in the Control of Neglected Diseases")
The Responsibility of the State in the Control of Neglected Diseases16,99 €![Proceedings: 1st International Conference on the Administrative Contract]( "Proceedings: 1st International Conference on the Administrative Contract")
Proceedings: 1st International Conference on the Administrative Contract46,99 €![Evolution of the Normative Force of International Tax Treaties]( "Evolution of the Normative Force of International Tax Treaties")
Evolution of the Normative Force of International Tax Treaties26,99 €
The relationship between international commitments and the Constitution is more complex.The Constitution of the Democratic Republic of the Congo states that "international treaties and agreements duly concluded have, upon their publication, an authority superior to that of the laws, subject to the application of each treaty or agreement by the other party". However, the same Constitution of 18 February 2006 provides that any conflicts of norms must be settled before the ratification or approval of the treaty. Its article 216 is based on the fact that if a treaty or international agreement contains a clause contrary to the Constitution, ratification or approval can only take place after the revision of the Constitution.When it is not possible to understand, or at least to interpret these provisions in a consistent or uniform manner, since the judge refuses to give precedence to one norm over another, how can a plausible solution be found?The answer to this question forms the very framework of this study.