Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The principle of due process of law in the Constitution]( "The principle of due process of law in the Constitution")
The principle of due process of law in the Constitution26,99 €![NEW LAW 12.403/11 AND THE PRINCIPLE OF INNOCENCE AND DIGNITY:]( "NEW LAW 12.403/11 AND THE PRINCIPLE OF INNOCENCE AND DIGNITY:")
NEW LAW 12.403/11 AND THE PRINCIPLE OF INNOCENCE AND DIGNITY:26,99 €![THE PRINCIPLE OF UNIVERSAL JUSTICE]( "THE PRINCIPLE OF UNIVERSAL JUSTICE")
THE PRINCIPLE OF UNIVERSAL JUSTICE19,99 €![The Principle of Proportionality]( "The Principle of Proportionality")
The Principle of Proportionality41,99 €![Iura Novit Curia Principle as a limitation of the Principle of Congruence]( "Iura Novit Curia Principle as a limitation of the Principle of Congruence")
Iura Novit Curia Principle as a limitation of the Principle of Congruence26,99 €![International Criminal Court¿s Complementarity Principle]( "International Criminal Court¿s Complementarity Principle")
International Criminal Court¿s Complementarity Principle32,99 €![The principle of legality and international crimes in Africa]( "The principle of legality and international crimes in Africa")
The principle of legality and international crimes in Africa32,99 €
This work deals with the possibility of the principle of insignificance being applied to crimes of abstract danger, taking as its theoretical basis the constitutional principles of the dignity of the human person, minimum intervention and offensiveness, as well as the modern conception of typicality in the material sense, going through the thesis of the disvalue of the result as the foundations of criminal injustice. The importance of the subject is emphasised by the growing proliferation of abstract danger crimes in today's risk society and their worrying reading in strictly formal terms, devoid of any material content. In this context, the aim of this work is to demonstrate the need to adapt the legislative technique of abstract danger crimes to constitutional dictates, by demanding a minimum level of harmful potentiality of the concrete conduct in relation to the legal asset that the legislator sought to protect, in order to confer legitimacy on criminal intervention, concluding that the application of the principle of insignificance is also compatible in the context of abstract danger crimes.