Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Individualization and Dosimetry of the Penalty in Constitutional Law]( "Individualization and Dosimetry of the Penalty in Constitutional Law")
Individualization and Dosimetry of the Penalty in Constitutional Law26,99 €![The principle of loyalty in public law in the digital age]( "The principle of loyalty in public law in the digital age")
The principle of loyalty in public law in the digital age43,99 €![Judicial control of the merits of discretionary administrative acts]( "Judicial control of the merits of discretionary administrative acts")
Judicial control of the merits of discretionary administrative acts26,99 €![Michel Rosenfeld's comprehensive pluralism]( "Michel Rosenfeld's comprehensive pluralism")
Michel Rosenfeld's comprehensive pluralism46,99 €![Constitutional Tax Principles]( "Constitutional Tax Principles")
Constitutional Tax Principles22,99 €![The Principle of Participation and Brazilian Municipalism]( "The Principle of Participation and Brazilian Municipalism")
The Principle of Participation and Brazilian Municipalism26,99 €![The Principle of Prohibition of Deficit]( "The Principle of Prohibition of Deficit")
The Principle of Prohibition of Deficit29,99 €
This work addresses the theme of the principle of pluralism of ideas and pedagogical conceptions provided for in sub-section III of Article 206 of the Federal Constitution of 1988 and in sub-section III of Article 3 of the Law of Directives and Bases of National Education (law 9394/96). The interest in the theme emerges from my experience as legal adviser to the Federation of Waldorf Schools of Brazil, which made me face the greatest juridical-educational challenge of my life, that is, how to preserve intact the foundations of a certain pedagogical conception when faced with changes in legislation that collide with the aforementioned pedagogy. The research problem arises from this reality: to verify whether the constitutional principle of pluralism of ideas and pedagogical conceptions serves as a legal support to a particular pedagogical proposal, in the face of subsequent changes in the Law of Directives and Bases of National Education that contradict assumptions of that pedagogical proposal?