Nothing can, if it is not understood from its immanence protected by the dialectical dynamics, resist to the criticism and to the intellectual speculation. Rather verbal. Let's not be psychorigids, because the radical criticism cannot be of the order of the human in its present historical phase. In any system there are what we could call conceptual arbitrators (postulates, evidences and irrefutable data). After having elaborated its protocol, a scientific research denies the determinisms, ethical and epistemological. In academic writing, professionals, rejecting legitimate subjectivity, fall into an objectivism that watches over the ideology of the university.