Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Credit Rating and the Impact on Capital Structure]( "Credit Rating and the Impact on Capital Structure")
Credit Rating and the Impact on Capital Structure18,95 €![Basel 3 capital requirements - overview and critical evaluation]( "Basel 3 capital requirements - overview and critical evaluation")
Basel 3 capital requirements - overview and critical evaluation18,95 €![The Stock Market Reaction to Presidential Tweets in the Case of the US-China Trade War]( "The Stock Market Reaction to Presidential Tweets in the Case of the US-China Trade War")
The Stock Market Reaction to Presidential Tweets in the Case of the US-China Trade War27,95 €![Reducing the variation of credit risk-weighted assets]( "Reducing the variation of credit risk-weighted assets")
Reducing the variation of credit risk-weighted assets18,95 €![Ranking Selected Public Sector Banks in India based on the Camel Rating Methodology]( "Ranking Selected Public Sector Banks in India based on the Camel Rating Methodology")
Ranking Selected Public Sector Banks in India based on the Camel Rating Methodology17,95 €![The Palgrave Handbook of European Banking Union Law]( "The Palgrave Handbook of European Banking Union Law")
The Palgrave Handbook of European Banking Union Law132,99 €![Risk Disclosure in the European Banking Industry]( "Risk Disclosure in the European Banking Industry")
Risk Disclosure in the European Banking Industry81,99 €
Master's Thesis from the year 2018 in the subject Business economics - Banking, Stock Exchanges, Insurance, Accounting, grade: 5.5/6, University of Zurich, language: English, abstract: Supervisory stress tests conducted in recent years by the European Banking Authority (EBA) provided potentially useful information to banks' management. This paper examines empirically the hypothesis that the stress test results published have influence on banks' ongoing risk mitigation efforts. The hypothesis rests on the evidence that stress tests have induced a reaction in bank equity and debt markets, which in turn sends a clear market signal to banks' management. The concept of market discipline implies that market prices can influence the banks' management in terms of their risk mitigation decisions. Using a difference-in-differences approach, it is measured how banks reacted to their respective stress test results. The evaluation shows a general rise in risk mitigation efforts of EU banks when looking at average total capital ratios since 2007. However, the results do reject the hypothesis that banks with low stress test scores have a stronger incentive to mitigate risk after the stress test publication. Yet low score banks demonstrate that adequate capital buffers were already set in place long before the stress test results. The higher capital buffers are reflected in above average total capital ratios of low score banks. This fact indicates that these banks might have reacted already before the stress test publication to make up for the higher asset risk exposure by growing stronger capital buffers.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.