Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Classified Index of National Labor Relations Board Decisions and Related Court Decisions, V. 340 Through 344, October 2003 Through July 2005]( "Classified Index of National Labor Relations Board Decisions and Related Court Decisions, V. 340 Through 344, October 2003 Through July 2005")
Classified Index of National Labor Relations Board Decisions and Related Court Decisions, V. 340 Through 344, October 2003 Through July 200599,99 €![La commission des relations de travail Recope]( "La commission des relations de travail Recope")
La commission des relations de travail Recope36,99 €![Labour Law and Industrial Relations in Japan]( "Labour Law and Industrial Relations in Japan")
Labour Law and Industrial Relations in Japan39,99 €![Process for challenging board and general assembly resolutions]( "Process for challenging board and general assembly resolutions")
Process for challenging board and general assembly resolutions25,99 €![Legal certainty in the structure of labour decisions]( "Legal certainty in the structure of labour decisions")
Legal certainty in the structure of labour decisions40,99 €![Legal regulation of the specificities of diplomatic labour]( "Legal regulation of the specificities of diplomatic labour")
Legal regulation of the specificities of diplomatic labour20,99 €![Artistic Child Labour under the Federal Constitution]( "Artistic Child Labour under the Federal Constitution")
Artistic Child Labour under the Federal Constitution32,99 €
The RECOPE LRB itself marked a milestone in the history of the LRBs in the Costa Rican public sector (institutional and corporate), basically on the basis of the binding nature of its agreements, as provided for in its constitutive legal regime. After a jurisdictional intervention by the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice, which annulled the precept of such binding nature for the employers' enterprise, the fate of the collegiate agreements of the JRL within RECOPE would be left to determinants - causes or factors - no longer so much legal (the entity, content and quality of the other organic, programmatic and procedural rules of its particular regime) as extra-legal (more circumstantial and even personalistic, political, ideological, inter-institutional and so on). Questions then arise as to what these determinants are, the relative importance of legal versus non-legal ones, and how the 'adverse' effects of one or the other could be mitigated in order to enhance the effectiveness of the interventions of the LRB towards the realisation of its foundational purposes.