Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Derecho a la prueba y a la motivación en la oralidad]( "Derecho a la prueba y a la motivación en la oralidad")
Derecho a la prueba y a la motivación en la oralidad26,99 €![The right of foreigners to marry]( "The right of foreigners to marry")
The right of foreigners to marry26,99 €![Institutional dialogues to address the Judicialisation of Health Care]( "Institutional dialogues to address the Judicialisation of Health Care")
Institutional dialogues to address the Judicialisation of Health Care29,99 €![Difficulties in the handling of digital evidence]( "Difficulties in the handling of digital evidence")
Difficulties in the handling of digital evidence36,99 €![Direito a provas e a uma fundamentação no processo oral]( "Direito a provas e a uma fundamentação no processo oral")
Direito a provas e a uma fundamentação no processo oral26,99 €![Manual for the proper application of a regulatory provision]( "Manual for the proper application of a regulatory provision")
Manual for the proper application of a regulatory provision36,99 €![Lights and shadows of the constitutionalization process]( "Lights and shadows of the constitutionalization process")
Lights and shadows of the constitutionalization process40,99 €
The purpose of this paper is to provide guidelines for the determination of the object of the controversy and the establishment of the points in debate, bearing in mind the unrestricted respect for the constitutional right to evidence and the right to the motivation of the sentence, in the current context of the oral process by hearings that the General Organic Code of Proceedings (COGEP) put into effect for tax matters and for other subjects; and, to this end, in the context of our constitutional and legal framework, we analyse the pronouncements of both doctrine and jurisprudence, especially Uruguayan, Peruvian and Spanish, to highlight the problem of establishing the object of the controversy, as well as its transcendence for the right to evidence and motivation, all of which leads us to propose two points of reform to the COGEP and suggestions for the academy (universities) and for legal scholars.