Essay from the year 2024 in the subject Computer Sciences - Artificial Intelligence, , language: English, abstract: The following Essay focuses on these questions: Can the adaptivity of artificial intelligence and systems theory be reconciled? Is there a theoretical parallel between the operation of artificial intelligence and the cited systems theory? People can make decisions within their own limits. Rarely are we able to expand our options and create a predictable advantage by new approaches but by more effective means. Let us simplify our thinking. We analyze a character from face-to-face, close contact events. Therefore, the theoretical structures, measurable indicators, at which the effectiveness of two "closed-order tactical" series of events should be compared. Thus, we are looking for a tactical framework that is not based on quantitative dominance. It means, on one hand, a competition between decision-making processes and knowledge patterns. As information becomes more abundant, the chances of the effectiveness of traditional decision-making infrastructures become slimmer and the need to incorporate artificial intelligence becomes greater. On the other hand, without the patterns of knowledge, how far could we rely on artificial intelligence? In our study, we only analyze close contact and closed order tactical warfare since, they are comparable and their effectiveness could be measured better. Niklas Luhmann's operational constructivism and the systems theory derived from it have not been taken up in the war sciences. It is, without any doubts, difficult to understand why Niklas Luhmann's theory is not included in the interpretation of military theories and decision theories.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.