Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![INDIVIDUAL REFERRAL TO THE REGIONAL COURTS OF DH]( "INDIVIDUAL REFERRAL TO THE REGIONAL COURTS OF DH")
INDIVIDUAL REFERRAL TO THE REGIONAL COURTS OF DH39,99 €![From the Right of Humanitarian Interference to the Responsibility to Protect]( "From the Right of Humanitarian Interference to the Responsibility to Protect")
From the Right of Humanitarian Interference to the Responsibility to Protect26,99 €![The contract, a legal instrument for the functioning of a company]( "The contract, a legal instrument for the functioning of a company")
The contract, a legal instrument for the functioning of a company26,99 €![Some ways to protect civil rights in Russia]( "Some ways to protect civil rights in Russia")
Some ways to protect civil rights in Russia32,99 €![The regionalization of peacekeeping 1963-2023:]( "The regionalization of peacekeeping 1963-2023:")
The regionalization of peacekeeping 1963-2023:29,99 €![The Nature Of The Right Of The Congolese State On The Soil:.]( "The Nature Of The Right Of The Congolese State On The Soil:.")
The Nature Of The Right Of The Congolese State On The Soil:.29,99 €![Big Data: Regulatory self-regulation and impact on individual rights]( "Big Data: Regulatory self-regulation and impact on individual rights")
Big Data: Regulatory self-regulation and impact on individual rights26,99 €
The imperative of respecting state sovereignty and ensuring the protection of human rights do not sit easily together. When one seeks to protect state sovereignty, human rights risk being violated. Conversely, the protection of human rights implies a limitation or even an erasure of state sovereignty. This paper first demonstrates that the principles of sovereignty and non-interference are an obstacle to the effective implementation of human rights. Thus, the sovereign State cannot ensure the protection of human rights from outside scrutiny. Secondly, it proves that in order to ensure a better protection of human rights, it is necessary to limit the sovereignty of States; this is what justifies democratic and humanitarian interference. Finally, it highlights the risks that illegal, untimely and poorly managed interventions can pose to the sovereign state, peace and international security.