Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Woods, Wolds and Groves]( "Woods, Wolds and Groves")
Woods, Wolds and Groves139,99 €![Non-timber Forest Products (NTFPs) and Domestication]( "Non-timber Forest Products (NTFPs) and Domestication")
Non-timber Forest Products (NTFPs) and Domestication32,99 €![Timber Trafficking in Vietnam]( "Timber Trafficking in Vietnam")
Timber Trafficking in Vietnam74,99 €![Sustainability in a Forest Fragment on the North Coast of Honduras]( "Sustainability in a Forest Fragment on the North Coast of Honduras")
Sustainability in a Forest Fragment on the North Coast of Honduras44,99 €![Reconciliation in the Forest?]( "Reconciliation in the Forest?")
Reconciliation in the Forest?51,99 €![The Impact Of Forest Resources On Communities Around Forests In Kenya]( "The Impact Of Forest Resources On Communities Around Forests In Kenya")
The Impact Of Forest Resources On Communities Around Forests In Kenya32,99 €![Statistics and Information Concerning the State of Missouri and its Cheap Farming Lands, the Grazing and Dairy Region, the Mineral and Timber Resources, the Unsurpassed Fruit Lands and Limitless Opportunities for Labor and Capital]( "Statistics and Information Concerning the State of Missouri and its Cheap Farming Lands, the Grazing and Dairy Region, the Mineral and Timber Resources, the Unsurpassed Fruit Lands and Limitless Opportunities for Labor and Capital")
Statistics and Information Concerning the State of Missouri and its Cheap Farming Lands, the Grazing and Dairy Region, the Mineral and Timber Resources, the Unsurpassed Fruit Lands and Limitless Opportunities for Labor and Capital13,90 €
To increase our understanding of the timber
harvesting behavior of family forest owners,
theoretical and empirical individual-choice models
were developed for the southeastern United States.
Owners were modeled as utility-maximizers who made
harvesting decisions by balancing amenity and profit
values. Harvesting was modeled as a function of
biophysical and socioeconomic variables. Data from
forest inventories and forest owner surveys
conducted by the U.S. Forest Service were used in
logistic regression harvesting models. Separate
models were generated for all family forest owners
and profit, multiple-objective, and amenity groups.
Harvesting propensities were highest for the profit
group and lowest for the amenity group. Stand
structure variables, such as basal area and volume,
were the most significant predictors of timber
harvesting. Other significant variables were
stumpage values, ownership objectives, and
absenteeism. The results of the models were
aggregated and implications for the region s timber
supply assessed. Continued shifts away from strong
timber objectives will decrease the flow of timber
from family forest lands.
harvesting behavior of family forest owners,
theoretical and empirical individual-choice models
were developed for the southeastern United States.
Owners were modeled as utility-maximizers who made
harvesting decisions by balancing amenity and profit
values. Harvesting was modeled as a function of
biophysical and socioeconomic variables. Data from
forest inventories and forest owner surveys
conducted by the U.S. Forest Service were used in
logistic regression harvesting models. Separate
models were generated for all family forest owners
and profit, multiple-objective, and amenity groups.
Harvesting propensities were highest for the profit
group and lowest for the amenity group. Stand
structure variables, such as basal area and volume,
were the most significant predictors of timber
harvesting. Other significant variables were
stumpage values, ownership objectives, and
absenteeism. The results of the models were
aggregated and implications for the region s timber
supply assessed. Continued shifts away from strong
timber objectives will decrease the flow of timber
from family forest lands.