Like its Nuremberg counterpart, the Tokyo trial was foundational in the field of international law. However, the persistent notion of 'victor's justice' in the existing literature has made it difficult to objectively assess. Cohen and Totani redress this by providing a fresh perspective based on careful examination of the trial record.
Like its Nuremberg counterpart, the Tokyo trial was foundational in the field of international law. However, the persistent notion of 'victor's justice' in the existing literature has made it difficult to objectively assess. Cohen and Totani redress this by providing a fresh perspective based on careful examination of the trial record.Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
David Cohen directs the WSD Handa Center for Human Rights and International Justice at Stanford University, California (formerly the War Crimes Studies Center at the University of California, Berkeley, where Cohen taught for thirty-five years before moving the Center to Stanford in 2013). He publishes on international criminal law, transitional justice, human rights, classics, and comparative legal history, while also directing human rights, rule of law, and accountability projects in South and Southeast Asia and Africa.
Inhaltsangabe
Introduction Part I. The Allied War Crimes Policy, the Indictment, and Court Proceedings: 1. The framework of the trial 2. Charges of crimes against peace 3. The Japanese system of government 4. Individual roles in the making of the war and the overall conspiracy 5. Counts on murder, conventional war crimes, and crimes against humanity 6. Accountability of war crimes Part II. Law and Jurisprudence of the Judgments and Separate Opinions: 7. The majority judgment: crimes against peace 8. An alternative perspective on accountability for crimes against peace: the two Webb judgments 9. The majority judgment on war crimes 10. An alternative Tokyo judgment: the draft Webb judgment on war crimes 11. The dissenting opinions by Justices Bernard and Roeling 12. Pal's 'judgment', or dissenting opinion, on crimes against peace 13. Pal's treatment of war crimes charges 14. The concurring opinions of Justices Webb and Jaranilla Conclusion.
Introduction Part I. The Allied War Crimes Policy, the Indictment, and Court Proceedings: 1. The framework of the trial 2. Charges of crimes against peace 3. The Japanese system of government 4. Individual roles in the making of the war and the overall conspiracy 5. Counts on murder, conventional war crimes, and crimes against humanity 6. Accountability of war crimes Part II. Law and Jurisprudence of the Judgments and Separate Opinions: 7. The majority judgment: crimes against peace 8. An alternative perspective on accountability for crimes against peace: the two Webb judgments 9. The majority judgment on war crimes 10. An alternative Tokyo judgment: the draft Webb judgment on war crimes 11. The dissenting opinions by Justices Bernard and Roeling 12. Pal's 'judgment', or dissenting opinion, on crimes against peace 13. Pal's treatment of war crimes charges 14. The concurring opinions of Justices Webb and Jaranilla Conclusion.
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Internetauftritt der buecher.de internetstores GmbH
Geschäftsführung: Monica Sawhney | Roland Kölbl | Günter Hilger
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Batheyer Straße 115 - 117, 58099 Hagen
Postanschrift: Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg
Amtsgericht Hagen HRB 13257
Steuernummer: 321/5800/1497
USt-IdNr: DE450055826