10,00 €
inkl. MwSt.
Versandkostenfrei*
Versandfertig in 6-10 Tagen
payback
0 °P sammeln
  • Broschiertes Buch

In Spring 2024, the European Court of Human Rights ruled for the first time that inadequate climate mitigation violates human rights. The Court's landmark rulings have significant implications, ranging from the design of domestic climate laws and ques- tions of standing to international trade issues and the European Union's climate governance.Building on a symposium by Verfassungsblog and the Climate Law Blog, this book offers the first comprehensive assessment of the rulings in KlimaSeniorinnen, Duarte Agostinho, and Carême. It explores key innovations, missed opportunities, and the untaken paths in European climate litigation.…mehr

Produktbeschreibung
In Spring 2024, the European Court of Human Rights ruled for the first time that inadequate climate mitigation violates human rights. The Court's landmark rulings have significant implications, ranging from the design of domestic climate laws and ques- tions of standing to international trade issues and the European Union's climate governance.Building on a symposium by Verfassungsblog and the Climate Law Blog, this book offers the first comprehensive assessment of the rulings in KlimaSeniorinnen, Duarte Agostinho, and Carême. It explores key innovations, missed opportunities, and the untaken paths in European climate litigation.
Autorenporträt
Dr. Maxim Bönnemann ist Redakteur beim Verfassungsblog und Comparative and International Law Research Scholar an der University of Michigan Law School.

Maria Antonia Tigre is the Director of Global Climate Change Litigation at the Sabin Center at Columbia Law School.