Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Intelligent Solutions for Cities and Mobility of the Future]( "Intelligent Solutions for Cities and Mobility of the Future")
Intelligent Solutions for Cities and Mobility of the Future125,99 €![Resilient Smart Cities]( "Resilient Smart Cities")
Resilient Smart Cities131,99 €![Resilient Smart Cities]( "Resilient Smart Cities")
Resilient Smart Cities134,99 €![The challenges of urban mobility in cities in transition]( "The challenges of urban mobility in cities in transition")
The challenges of urban mobility in cities in transition39,99 €![Functionality and Social Acceptance of Safe Water Technology]( "Functionality and Social Acceptance of Safe Water Technology")
Functionality and Social Acceptance of Safe Water Technology32,99 €![The Transition Towards a Smart Grids Society]( "The Transition Towards a Smart Grids Society")
The Transition Towards a Smart Grids Society38,99 €![The transition to a hydrogen economy in Thailand]( "The transition to a hydrogen economy in Thailand")
The transition to a hydrogen economy in Thailand32,99 €
Most contemporary notions of the fairly recent concept 'smart mobility' portray an imminent transition of similar socio-economic consequences as the shift from horses to automobiles did 100 years ago. Present book thus offers an in-depth look at the variables involved in the equation of smart mobility acceptance (1) and envisaged institutional change (2).
Both views are embedded in the Multi-Level Perspective. Study 1 develops a structural equation model in SmartPLS. Use cases cover eBikes (N=537), mobility-as-a-service (N=531), and fully automated vehicles (N=558). Based on the results, acceptance relies on five factors: performance expectancy, facilitating conditions, social influence, habit, and hedonic motivation.
Study 2 applies the Institutional Role Model (IRM) to better understand system dynamics. Thus, the smart mobility ecosystem is mapped in a structured manner. It identifies nine institutions, as well as four technical and four economic roles. Results of interviews with experts (N=8) support the IRM's significance as a vision provider for a new mobility regime.
In the end, these two perspectives amalgamate. This opens a sophisticated space for public debate about the commencing transition to smart mobility.
Both views are embedded in the Multi-Level Perspective. Study 1 develops a structural equation model in SmartPLS. Use cases cover eBikes (N=537), mobility-as-a-service (N=531), and fully automated vehicles (N=558). Based on the results, acceptance relies on five factors: performance expectancy, facilitating conditions, social influence, habit, and hedonic motivation.
Study 2 applies the Institutional Role Model (IRM) to better understand system dynamics. Thus, the smart mobility ecosystem is mapped in a structured manner. It identifies nine institutions, as well as four technical and four economic roles. Results of interviews with experts (N=8) support the IRM's significance as a vision provider for a new mobility regime.
In the end, these two perspectives amalgamate. This opens a sophisticated space for public debate about the commencing transition to smart mobility.