Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The regionalisation of the world trade system and the influence on the WTO]( "The regionalisation of the world trade system and the influence on the WTO")
The regionalisation of the world trade system and the influence on the WTO16,95 €![Global Governance and Japan]( "Global Governance and Japan")
Global Governance and Japan52,99 €![The internal and external reasons for the failure of the Doha-Round and the role of the industrial and developing countries]( "The internal and external reasons for the failure of the Doha-Round and the role of the industrial and developing countries")
The internal and external reasons for the failure of the Doha-Round and the role of the industrial and developing countries17,95 €![The EU in International Negotiations]( "The EU in International Negotiations")
The EU in International Negotiations95,99 €![The TRIPS Waiver Negotiations at the World Trade Organization (October 2020- June 2022)]( "The TRIPS Waiver Negotiations at the World Trade Organization (October 2020- June 2022)")
The TRIPS Waiver Negotiations at the World Trade Organization (October 2020- June 2022)45,00 €![The European Union and the New Trade Politics]( "The European Union and the New Trade Politics")
The European Union and the New Trade Politics195,99 €![The EU in International Negotiations]( "The EU in International Negotiations")
The EU in International Negotiations95,99 €
Seminar paper from the year 2005 in the subject Politics - Topic: International Organisations, grade: 1.7, University of Tubingen (Institut fuer Politikwissenschaft), course: International Relations (Seminar), language: English, abstract: This essay's general interest is in whether international trade institutions comply with a sense of justice. Concretely speaking, it is to be analysed whether the outcome of a specific international trade negotiation, namely the Uruguay Round, which lasted from 1983 to 1994, is to be judged as "just" or "unjust". Fulfilling this task, this essay at first displays a concept to define the very abstract term of justice. The regarded definition will be mainly according to Cecilia Albin.The second part of this essay provides a summary of main features of the Uruguay Round's final act, the Agreement on Agriculture (AoA) and the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). Although other sections of the agreement are highly interesting, too, these two fields prove to be extraordinarily useful for this paper's purpose. Nevertheless it is the my intention to point on other issues of interest for instance labour standards or the further development since 1994 in this essay where it seems helpful and possible. The chapter summarizing the Uruguay Round's outcome is mainly based on World Trade Organisation (WTO) sources, to insure that no subliminal judgement is included or at least none already supporting the view of the later discussed criticism.The third section analyses the Uruguay Round's outcome concerning agriculture and intellectual property. The criticism is derived from economic authors like Dasgupta and Sander/Inotai and development orientated NGOs like OXFAM as well. In most cases the analysis is critical of the agreement, at the same time avoiding the word "justice". This gap shall be filled by the author's assessment of the criticism, judging it, and linking it explicitly to the question of justice. At the end of the essay I want to draw a conclusion about justice in the Uruguay Round agreement, also taking into consideration recent developments within the agreement of the WTO, and referring to the question raised at the beginning of this introduction about ethics and morality in IR.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.