Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Health and Psychology: An Islamic Perspective. Vol 1]( "Health and Psychology: An Islamic Perspective. Vol 1")
Health and Psychology: An Islamic Perspective. Vol 150,99 €![Toward a Positive Psychology of Islam and Muslims]( "Toward a Positive Psychology of Islam and Muslims")
Toward a Positive Psychology of Islam and Muslims110,99 €![Toward a Positive Psychology of Islam and Muslims]( "Toward a Positive Psychology of Islam and Muslims")
Toward a Positive Psychology of Islam and Muslims110,99 €![The Acute Effects of Amphetamines on Driving Cognition and the SFSTs]( "The Acute Effects of Amphetamines on Driving Cognition and the SFSTs")
The Acute Effects of Amphetamines on Driving Cognition and the SFSTs51,99 €![The Psychotic States of America]( "The Psychotic States of America")
The Psychotic States of America38,99 €![The role of perceptual learning in recognition memory for faces]( "The role of perceptual learning in recognition memory for faces")
The role of perceptual learning in recognition memory for faces32,99 €![The Role of Rhes Protein in the Dopaminergic System of Rodents]( "The Role of Rhes Protein in the Dopaminergic System of Rodents")
The Role of Rhes Protein in the Dopaminergic System of Rodents32,99 €
Conflict between groups does not arise in a vacuum.
To the contrary, conflicts especially those that are
enduring and seemingly intractable are embedded in
an information-rich context, often with a long and
complicated history characterized by multiple forces
operating at different levels of analysis (economic,
political, religious, interpersonal). Yet
participants and outside observers are rarely
overwhelmed by such complexity and ambiguity,
adopting instead a coherent depiction of the
conflict, often with an unequivocal allocation of
blame to one side or the other. While we may know the
final judgments of third party observers, it is not
always clear how people arrive at these judgments.
This work attempts to explain why people arrive at
vastly different conclusions regarding blame when
observing an ambiguous and complex situation of
conflict. More specifically, it looks at popular
misconceptions and stereotypes of Islam and seeks to
explain how anti-Muslim prejudice has come to
strongly influence perceptions of blame in real-world
conflicts involving Arabs or Muslims.
To the contrary, conflicts especially those that are
enduring and seemingly intractable are embedded in
an information-rich context, often with a long and
complicated history characterized by multiple forces
operating at different levels of analysis (economic,
political, religious, interpersonal). Yet
participants and outside observers are rarely
overwhelmed by such complexity and ambiguity,
adopting instead a coherent depiction of the
conflict, often with an unequivocal allocation of
blame to one side or the other. While we may know the
final judgments of third party observers, it is not
always clear how people arrive at these judgments.
This work attempts to explain why people arrive at
vastly different conclusions regarding blame when
observing an ambiguous and complex situation of
conflict. More specifically, it looks at popular
misconceptions and stereotypes of Islam and seeks to
explain how anti-Muslim prejudice has come to
strongly influence perceptions of blame in real-world
conflicts involving Arabs or Muslims.