Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![A Theoretical Discussion of Motivation and Leadership in Denmark]( "A Theoretical Discussion of Motivation and Leadership in Denmark")
A Theoretical Discussion of Motivation and Leadership in Denmark35,99 €![Theoretical and Quantitative Approaches to the Study of Mortuary Practice]( "Theoretical and Quantitative Approaches to the Study of Mortuary Practice")
Theoretical and Quantitative Approaches to the Study of Mortuary Practice150,99 €![Inequalities in the Health Sector: A Theoretical Approach]( "Inequalities in the Health Sector: A Theoretical Approach")
Inequalities in the Health Sector: A Theoretical Approach31,99 €![A New Theoretical Framework for the Analysis of CSR]( "A New Theoretical Framework for the Analysis of CSR")
A New Theoretical Framework for the Analysis of CSR35,99 €![Theoretical Approaches to Artefacts, Settlement and Society, Part ii]( "Theoretical Approaches to Artefacts, Settlement and Society, Part ii")
Theoretical Approaches to Artefacts, Settlement and Society, Part ii120,99 €![Theoretical Horizons]( "Theoretical Horizons")
Theoretical Horizons60,99 €![Sketching Theoretical Biology]( "Sketching Theoretical Biology")
Sketching Theoretical Biology204,99 €
This investigation tested the ability of different
resistance strategies to protect the positive COO
image attributed to products in the face of singe
and multiple competitor attacks. The results
illustrate the superiority of refutational over
supportive and restoration messages in protecting
the positive COO image when facing single or
multiple attacks. Also, the results indicate that
refutational defenses, in which the message content
(affective, cognitive or combined) is matched with
the base of the attitude (affective or cognitive),
provide best protection against combined competitor
attacks (affective and cognitive). Combined
refutational defenses work better than mismatching
refutational defenses, but not as well as matching
refutational defenses. However, when facing multiple
attacks, matching and combined refutational defenses
work equally well and better than mismatching
refutational defenses.
resistance strategies to protect the positive COO
image attributed to products in the face of singe
and multiple competitor attacks. The results
illustrate the superiority of refutational over
supportive and restoration messages in protecting
the positive COO image when facing single or
multiple attacks. Also, the results indicate that
refutational defenses, in which the message content
(affective, cognitive or combined) is matched with
the base of the attitude (affective or cognitive),
provide best protection against combined competitor
attacks (affective and cognitive). Combined
refutational defenses work better than mismatching
refutational defenses, but not as well as matching
refutational defenses. However, when facing multiple
attacks, matching and combined refutational defenses
work equally well and better than mismatching
refutational defenses.