Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The International Criminal Court and Positive Complementarity. ASP InstitutionalFramework]( "The International Criminal Court and Positive Complementarity. ASP InstitutionalFramework")
The International Criminal Court and Positive Complementarity. ASP InstitutionalFramework17,95 €![The Jurisdiction of the ICC in Relation to The Great Powers. The U.S.¿ Impact on Sovereignty and Authority]( "The Jurisdiction of the ICC in Relation to The Great Powers. The U.S.¿ Impact on Sovereignty and Authority")
The Jurisdiction of the ICC in Relation to The Great Powers. The U.S.¿ Impact on Sovereignty and Authority18,95 €![The African Heads of State and the International Criminal Justice]( "The African Heads of State and the International Criminal Justice")
The African Heads of State and the International Criminal Justice70,99 €![The common agricultural policy of the European Union]( "The common agricultural policy of the European Union")
The common agricultural policy of the European Union17,95 €![Complementarity, Jurisdiction and Admissibility: The ICC and Kenya]( "Complementarity, Jurisdiction and Admissibility: The ICC and Kenya")
Complementarity, Jurisdiction and Admissibility: The ICC and Kenya26,99 €![Reissued Patents: Comments On the Decision of the U. S. Supreme Court in the Case of Miller Vs. the Bridgeport Brass Co., Practical Effe]( "Reissued Patents: Comments On the Decision of the U. S. Supreme Court in the Case of Miller Vs. the Bridgeport Brass Co., Practical Effe")
Reissued Patents: Comments On the Decision of the U. S. Supreme Court in the Case of Miller Vs. the Bridgeport Brass Co., Practical Effe31,99 €![Discretion, Disclosure and Confidentiality at the ICC]( "Discretion, Disclosure and Confidentiality at the ICC")
Discretion, Disclosure and Confidentiality at the ICC32,99 €
Research Paper (postgraduate) from the year 2024 in the subject Law - Comparative Legal Systems, Comparative Law, University of Ghana, Legon, language: English, abstract: This paper explores the dichotomy between theoretical definitions of justice and their practical applications in contemporary legal systems. Theoretical frameworks from renowned philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle, Kant, and Rawls are examined, highlighting their distinct yet converging notions of fairness, equity, and moral righteousness. Despite these comprehensive theories, modern justice systems often fail to uphold these ideals due to systemic biases, disparities in legal outcomes, and political influences. Through case studies such as the Central Park Five and the International Criminal Court's recent controversy involving Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the paper illustrates the persistent challenges in achieving true justice. The discussion identifies corruption, discrimination, and limited access to legal resources as significant barriers to justice. Potential reforms, including enhancing transparency, increasing access to legal aid, and promoting procedural fairness, are proposed to bridge the gap between theoretical justice and its real-world application. By understanding both the philosophical foundations and practical challenges, the paper underscores the need for continuous efforts to align legal practices with the ideals of fairness and equity, aiming to create a more just and equitable society.