- Broschiertes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
First Published in 2002. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- Mathew IredaleThe Problem of Free Will58,99 €
- Ferenc HuoranszkiFreedom of the Will77,99 €
- Friedrich NietzscheThe Will to Power21,99 €
- Laura EkstromFree Will62,99 €
- Alan E JohnsonFree Will and Human Life15,99 €
- Carolina SartorioCausation and Free Will41,99 €
- Dimitris VardoulakisFreedom from the Free Will38,99 €
-
-
-
First Published in 2002. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Taylor & Francis
- Seitenzahl: 280
- Erscheinungstermin: 23. Dezember 2014
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 216mm x 140mm x 15mm
- Gewicht: 327g
- ISBN-13: 9781138870994
- ISBN-10: 1138870994
- Artikelnr.: 42489419
- Verlag: Taylor & Francis
- Seitenzahl: 280
- Erscheinungstermin: 23. Dezember 2014
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 216mm x 140mm x 15mm
- Gewicht: 327g
- ISBN-13: 9781138870994
- ISBN-10: 1138870994
- Artikelnr.: 42489419
Henri Bergson
Chapter I The Intensity of Psychic States; Chapter II 1I had already
completed the present work when I read in the Critique philosophique (for
1883 and 1884) F. Pillon's very remarkable refutation of an interesting
article by G. Noel on the interconnexion of the notions of number and
space. But I have not found it necessary to make any alterations in the
following pages, seeing that Pillon does not distinguish between time as
quality and time as quantity, between the multiplicity of juxtaposition and
that of interpenetration. Without this vital distinction, which it is the
chief aim of the present chapter to establish, it would be possible to
maintain, with Pillon, that number may be built up from the relation of
co-existence. But what is here meant by co-existence ? If the co-existing
terms form an organic whole, they will never lead us to the notion of
number; if they remain distinct, they are in juxtaposition and we are
dealing with space. It is no use to quote the example of simultaneous
impressions received by several senses. We either leave these sensations
their specific differences, which amounts to saying that we do not count
them; or else we eliminate their differences, and then how are we to
distinguish them if not by their position or that of their symbols ? We
shall see that the verb " to distinguish " has two meanings, the one
qualitative, the other quantitative : these two meanings have been
confused, in my opinion, by the philosophers who have dealt with the
relations between number and space. The Idea of Duration; Chapter III The
Organization of Conscious States Free Will; Conclusion;
completed the present work when I read in the Critique philosophique (for
1883 and 1884) F. Pillon's very remarkable refutation of an interesting
article by G. Noel on the interconnexion of the notions of number and
space. But I have not found it necessary to make any alterations in the
following pages, seeing that Pillon does not distinguish between time as
quality and time as quantity, between the multiplicity of juxtaposition and
that of interpenetration. Without this vital distinction, which it is the
chief aim of the present chapter to establish, it would be possible to
maintain, with Pillon, that number may be built up from the relation of
co-existence. But what is here meant by co-existence ? If the co-existing
terms form an organic whole, they will never lead us to the notion of
number; if they remain distinct, they are in juxtaposition and we are
dealing with space. It is no use to quote the example of simultaneous
impressions received by several senses. We either leave these sensations
their specific differences, which amounts to saying that we do not count
them; or else we eliminate their differences, and then how are we to
distinguish them if not by their position or that of their symbols ? We
shall see that the verb " to distinguish " has two meanings, the one
qualitative, the other quantitative : these two meanings have been
confused, in my opinion, by the philosophers who have dealt with the
relations between number and space. The Idea of Duration; Chapter III The
Organization of Conscious States Free Will; Conclusion;
Chapter I The Intensity of Psychic States; Chapter II 1I had already
completed the present work when I read in the Critique philosophique (for
1883 and 1884) F. Pillon's very remarkable refutation of an interesting
article by G. Noel on the interconnexion of the notions of number and
space. But I have not found it necessary to make any alterations in the
following pages, seeing that Pillon does not distinguish between time as
quality and time as quantity, between the multiplicity of juxtaposition and
that of interpenetration. Without this vital distinction, which it is the
chief aim of the present chapter to establish, it would be possible to
maintain, with Pillon, that number may be built up from the relation of
co-existence. But what is here meant by co-existence ? If the co-existing
terms form an organic whole, they will never lead us to the notion of
number; if they remain distinct, they are in juxtaposition and we are
dealing with space. It is no use to quote the example of simultaneous
impressions received by several senses. We either leave these sensations
their specific differences, which amounts to saying that we do not count
them; or else we eliminate their differences, and then how are we to
distinguish them if not by their position or that of their symbols ? We
shall see that the verb " to distinguish " has two meanings, the one
qualitative, the other quantitative : these two meanings have been
confused, in my opinion, by the philosophers who have dealt with the
relations between number and space. The Idea of Duration; Chapter III The
Organization of Conscious States Free Will; Conclusion;
completed the present work when I read in the Critique philosophique (for
1883 and 1884) F. Pillon's very remarkable refutation of an interesting
article by G. Noel on the interconnexion of the notions of number and
space. But I have not found it necessary to make any alterations in the
following pages, seeing that Pillon does not distinguish between time as
quality and time as quantity, between the multiplicity of juxtaposition and
that of interpenetration. Without this vital distinction, which it is the
chief aim of the present chapter to establish, it would be possible to
maintain, with Pillon, that number may be built up from the relation of
co-existence. But what is here meant by co-existence ? If the co-existing
terms form an organic whole, they will never lead us to the notion of
number; if they remain distinct, they are in juxtaposition and we are
dealing with space. It is no use to quote the example of simultaneous
impressions received by several senses. We either leave these sensations
their specific differences, which amounts to saying that we do not count
them; or else we eliminate their differences, and then how are we to
distinguish them if not by their position or that of their symbols ? We
shall see that the verb " to distinguish " has two meanings, the one
qualitative, the other quantitative : these two meanings have been
confused, in my opinion, by the philosophers who have dealt with the
relations between number and space. The Idea of Duration; Chapter III The
Organization of Conscious States Free Will; Conclusion;