Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![GUN OWNERSHIP IN THE U.S. AND ASPECTS TO PREVENT MASSACRES]( "GUN OWNERSHIP IN THE U.S. AND ASPECTS TO PREVENT MASSACRES")
GUN OWNERSHIP IN THE U.S. AND ASPECTS TO PREVENT MASSACRES51,99 €![From rights to the environment to rights for the environment]( "From rights to the environment to rights for the environment")
From rights to the environment to rights for the environment26,99 €![Looting or Taking? Analyzing the Causes and Remedies to the Fight Against Corruption in Kenya]( "Looting or Taking? Analyzing the Causes and Remedies to the Fight Against Corruption in Kenya")
Looting or Taking? Analyzing the Causes and Remedies to the Fight Against Corruption in Kenya26,99 €![The Status of Prisoners' Right To Conjugal Visit in Ethiopia]( "The Status of Prisoners' Right To Conjugal Visit in Ethiopia")
The Status of Prisoners' Right To Conjugal Visit in Ethiopia26,99 €![The Implementation and Protection of the Right to Education in Nigeria]( "The Implementation and Protection of the Right to Education in Nigeria")
The Implementation and Protection of the Right to Education in Nigeria51,99 €![Contours of Judicial Interpretation of Right to Environment in India]( "Contours of Judicial Interpretation of Right to Environment in India")
Contours of Judicial Interpretation of Right to Environment in India36,99 €![Ethiopian Desired Accession to the WTO: The Market Access Issues]( "Ethiopian Desired Accession to the WTO: The Market Access Issues")
Ethiopian Desired Accession to the WTO: The Market Access Issues36,99 €
Genocide is an outrageous crime, prohibited by international customary law, even absent a formal treaty obligation. The International community and the Contracting Parties of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide have a direct obligation both to prevent and to punish genocide. However, they fail to do so. The reason for this lies in the unclear meaning of the intent to destroy as defined by the Convention. Currently, there are two different understandings of intent; knowledge-based and purpose-based understanding. This thesis explores both interpretations by a comparative analysis method. It demonstrates that the intent to destroy should be interpreted in a manner that will ensure that the crime of genocide is both prevented and punished. The key findings show that both the knowledge-based approach and the purpose-based approach perfectly fit together; which of them shall be applied depends on the degree of individual liability, and on whether the focus is on punishing or prevention.