Between 1900 and 1940, Americans confronted a puzzle: how could administrative agencies address the nation's troubles without violating individual liberty? From the close reasoning of judges, the self-interest of lawyers, and the machinations of politicians, an answer emerged.
Between 1900 and 1940, Americans confronted a puzzle: how could administrative agencies address the nation's troubles without violating individual liberty? From the close reasoning of judges, the self-interest of lawyers, and the machinations of politicians, an answer emerged.
Trained as a lawyer and a historian, Daniel R. Ernst has been a member of the faculty of the Georgetown University Law Center since 1988. His first book, Lawyers against Labor (1995), won the Littleton Griswold Award of the American Historical Association. He has been a John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation Fellow, a Fulbright Research Scholar at the National Library of New Zealand, and, from 2006-2010, a co-editor of 'Studies in Legal History,' a book series sponsored by the American Society for Legal History. He writes on the political history of American legal institutions.
Inhaltsangabe
Introduction: Tocqueville's Nightmare Freund and Frankfurter Hughes Chief Justice Hughes New York, 1938 Pound and Frank Conclusion: Good Administration Acknowledgments Abbreviations for Sources Consulted
Introduction: Tocqueville's Nightmare Freund and Frankfurter Hughes Chief Justice Hughes New York, 1938 Pound and Frank Conclusion: Good Administration Acknowledgments Abbreviations for Sources Consulted
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309
