Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Is Tactical Air Support of an Airborne Battalion Feasible in Adverse Weather?]( "Is Tactical Air Support of an Airborne Battalion Feasible in Adverse Weather?")
Is Tactical Air Support of an Airborne Battalion Feasible in Adverse Weather?60,99 €![Green to Greener: Is Biodiesel a Feasible Alternative Fuel for U.S. Army Tactical Vehicles?]( "Green to Greener: Is Biodiesel a Feasible Alternative Fuel for U.S. Army Tactical Vehicles?")
Green to Greener: Is Biodiesel a Feasible Alternative Fuel for U.S. Army Tactical Vehicles?60,99 €![Is the U.S. Navy Prepared to Conduct Peace Operations in Support of the National Security Strategy?]( "Is the U.S. Navy Prepared to Conduct Peace Operations in Support of the National Security Strategy?")
Is the U.S. Navy Prepared to Conduct Peace Operations in Support of the National Security Strategy?60,99 €![Pure National Security Strategy]( "Pure National Security Strategy")
Pure National Security Strategy60,99 €![Strategic Responsiveness: Does Joint Force Capability Support National Security Strategy]( "Strategic Responsiveness: Does Joint Force Capability Support National Security Strategy")
Strategic Responsiveness: Does Joint Force Capability Support National Security Strategy60,99 €![The Elephant in the Room: Friction Points Between India's Foreign Policy and the 2010 United States National Security Strategy]( "The Elephant in the Room: Friction Points Between India's Foreign Policy and the 2010 United States National Security Strategy")
The Elephant in the Room: Friction Points Between India's Foreign Policy and the 2010 United States National Security Strategy60,99 €![Path to a Culturally Relevant National Security Strategy]( "Path to a Culturally Relevant National Security Strategy")
Path to a Culturally Relevant National Security Strategy60,99 €
As a part of the response to the Al Qaida attacks on 11 September 2001, the United States found itself having to answer many difficult questions regarding its action in the Global War on Terrorism. One of the most contentious was the use of torture against captured enemy fighters. The United States, a strong proponent for humanitarian law, soon found itself criticized for its treatment of detainees. As a result, commentators and politicians have had endless debates about interrogation techniques and the legal applicability of international law and treaties to a nonstate enemy. The central research question derived from these issues is: Is torture a viable tool for use in achieving goals as outlined in the 2006 National Security Strategy? Interrogational torture was examined from the following standpoints: legal, effectiveness, and ethical. Results showed that torture is wrong. The next step applied the analytical results against the ethical decision-making triangle and also concluded that from the three standpoints torture was wrong and not a feasible means of achieving the United States' national security objectives.