Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Weapons of Mass Destruction Pose a Serious Threat to U.S. Cities: How Prepared Are We?]( "Weapons of Mass Destruction Pose a Serious Threat to U.S. Cities: How Prepared Are We?")
Weapons of Mass Destruction Pose a Serious Threat to U.S. Cities: How Prepared Are We?60,99 €![Weapons of Mass Destruction Pose a Serious Threat to U.S. Cities: How Prepared Are We?]( "Weapons of Mass Destruction Pose a Serious Threat to U.S. Cities: How Prepared Are We?")
Weapons of Mass Destruction Pose a Serious Threat to U.S. Cities: How Prepared Are We?60,99 €![Negating the Threat of Libyan Weapons of Mass Destruction]( "Negating the Threat of Libyan Weapons of Mass Destruction")
Negating the Threat of Libyan Weapons of Mass Destruction60,99 €![Improving Risk Education to United States Citizens about the Weapons of Mass Destruction Threat]( "Improving Risk Education to United States Citizens about the Weapons of Mass Destruction Threat")
Improving Risk Education to United States Citizens about the Weapons of Mass Destruction Threat60,99 €![Proliferation Weapons of Mass Destruction and International Insecurity: NATO's Approach to a New Threat]( "Proliferation Weapons of Mass Destruction and International Insecurity: NATO's Approach to a New Threat")
Proliferation Weapons of Mass Destruction and International Insecurity: NATO's Approach to a New Threat61,99 €![United States Army Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Corps Capability for Combating the Contemporary Weapons of Mass Destruction Threat]( "United States Army Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Corps Capability for Combating the Contemporary Weapons of Mass Destruction Threat")
United States Army Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Corps Capability for Combating the Contemporary Weapons of Mass Destruction Threat61,99 €![The Role of the National Guard in Responding to Weapons of Mass Destruction Attacks in the U.S.: Where Do We Stand?]( "The Role of the National Guard in Responding to Weapons of Mass Destruction Attacks in the U.S.: Where Do We Stand?")
The Role of the National Guard in Responding to Weapons of Mass Destruction Attacks in the U.S.: Where Do We Stand?60,99 €
Nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC) proliferation is recognized as a serious threat across the operational spectrum--from the deployment of forces to posthostility activities, but there is a misconception when it comes to toxic industrial chemicals (TICs) as equal to CW (CW) agents threats. Release of these TICs could inflict the same damage as a military CW agent, albeit larger quantities of the TIC would be required. Thus, this thesis addresses the following question: Do TICs pose a weapons of mass destruction (WMD) threat, and what are their effects on joint military doctrine for operations in chemical environments? A significant array of books, periodicals, government documents, and Internet materials dealing with WMD as they relate to CW agents' (i.e., TICs) toxicities at low levels were reviewed. This thesis concludes that in the hands of terrorists, aggressive states or nonstate actors, TICs will serve as WMD, undermine regional stability, and threaten US interests. In general, joint doctrine for combat and noncombat operations inadequately take account of current TIC realities. Based on the documents cited in this thesis, the US Armed Forces have not collectively identified overall force structure requirements for dealing with this threat.