Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Countermeasures to an Initial Surprise Attack Through the Analysis of Historical Examples]( "Countermeasures to an Initial Surprise Attack Through the Analysis of Historical Examples")
Countermeasures to an Initial Surprise Attack Through the Analysis of Historical Examples60,99 €![Decisive Points in Stability and Support Operations: Current U.S. Army Doctrine Continues to Support the Tactical Commander]( "Decisive Points in Stability and Support Operations: Current U.S. Army Doctrine Continues to Support the Tactical Commander")
Decisive Points in Stability and Support Operations: Current U.S. Army Doctrine Continues to Support the Tactical Commander60,99 €![Theater Airlift Management and Control: Should We Turn Back the Clock to Be Ready for Tomorrow?]( "Theater Airlift Management and Control: Should We Turn Back the Clock to Be Ready for Tomorrow?")
Theater Airlift Management and Control: Should We Turn Back the Clock to Be Ready for Tomorrow?60,99 €![Deliberate River Crossings: Historic Examples vs. Current Doctrine]( "Deliberate River Crossings: Historic Examples vs. Current Doctrine")
Deliberate River Crossings: Historic Examples vs. Current Doctrine60,99 €![Theater Airlift Management and Control: Should We Turn Back the Clock to Be Ready for Tomorrow?]( "Theater Airlift Management and Control: Should We Turn Back the Clock to Be Ready for Tomorrow?")
Theater Airlift Management and Control: Should We Turn Back the Clock to Be Ready for Tomorrow?60,99 €![Fear and Loathing in the Air: Combat Fear and Stress in the Air Force]( "Fear and Loathing in the Air: Combat Fear and Stress in the Air Force")
Fear and Loathing in the Air: Combat Fear and Stress in the Air Force60,99 €![Rear Operations: Protecting the Points of Decision]( "Rear Operations: Protecting the Points of Decision")
Rear Operations: Protecting the Points of Decision60,99 €
This paper will examine how history is currently used in promulgating doctrine, and offer suggestions where appropriate. Specific questions to be examined are: (1) Is there evidence to support the hypothesis that airmen have over the last several decades developed an anti-doctrinal bias? (2) If there is evidence of such a historical bias, does the current Air Force culture retain this bias? (3) If so, what procedural steps should be implemented in order to reverse such a bias? (4) In what ways can historical examples prove useful in the doctrine process? (5) What elements of doctrine should be supported with historical illustrations? (6) Can these illustrations be used to assemble a comprehensive anthology of the Air Force s major doctrinal shifts? and (7) How can the Air Force best present historical examples within the doctrinal manuals? Research for this project was conducted by reviewing appropriate historical literature and through personal discussions with select personnel in the Center for Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education (CADRE) currently developing formal operational level doctrine. There is ample evidence to suggest that the Air Force retains a long-standing antidoctrinal bias, at least at the basic and operational levels. This bias has resulted in an institution that places little value on the significance of doctrine.