Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Two-Way Mirror]( "The Two-Way Mirror")
The Two-Way Mirror65,99 €![Feasibility Evaluation of Employing a Sea-Based Adjunct to the United States' National Missile Defense Strategy]( "Feasibility Evaluation of Employing a Sea-Based Adjunct to the United States' National Missile Defense Strategy")
Feasibility Evaluation of Employing a Sea-Based Adjunct to the United States' National Missile Defense Strategy60,99 €![Understanding an Insurgency: Achieving the United States' Strategic Objectives in Afghanistan]( "Understanding an Insurgency: Achieving the United States' Strategic Objectives in Afghanistan")
Understanding an Insurgency: Achieving the United States' Strategic Objectives in Afghanistan60,99 €![The New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty and Its Impact on the United States' Elements of National Power]( "The New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty and Its Impact on the United States' Elements of National Power")
The New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty and Its Impact on the United States' Elements of National Power60,99 €![Hearts, Minds, and Defense: Public Diplomacy, Strategic Communication and the United States' Search for Answers in a Post 9/11 World]( "Hearts, Minds, and Defense: Public Diplomacy, Strategic Communication and the United States' Search for Answers in a Post 9/11 World")
Hearts, Minds, and Defense: Public Diplomacy, Strategic Communication and the United States' Search for Answers in a Post 9/11 World60,99 €![The United States' National Interests in Central Asia]( "The United States' National Interests in Central Asia")
The United States' National Interests in Central Asia60,99 €![Hegemon and Potential Peer Competitor: An Analysis of the United States' Security Strategy Towards China]( "Hegemon and Potential Peer Competitor: An Analysis of the United States' Security Strategy Towards China")
Hegemon and Potential Peer Competitor: An Analysis of the United States' Security Strategy Towards China60,99 €
Multinational operations have been the norm in warfare and information management between multinational forces has long been an issue within alliances and in coalition warfare. The ongoing Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA) in information technology (IT) and management (IM) has increased the level of difficulty associated with multinational information interoperability. Canada's Future Army (CFA) and the US Army's Objective Force (AAN) places a priority on information as a critical requirement for future missions. This is inherent in Canadian and US Army Doctrine manuals, Strategic Visions, and Future Army capability requirements. Canada recognizes that it will not be able to possess all the operational and strategic ISR resources needed to ensure information superiority to properly support operational battle command. To compensate for this disparity, the Department of National Defense envisions a closer military link to U.S. Forces to allow access to high-end ISR assets. As the US Army continues to move ahead along this technological azimuth, OPSEC concerns over a technological gap between US and other military has caused IM to become dysfunctional. This was the case in Kosovo and unless IM protocols are adjusted, the potential technological gap will not allow the AAN and CFA to share in the common operational picture that will be critical for future operations.