Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Unconstitutionality by way of exception: the fate reserved for laws and regulations declared unconstitutional]( "Unconstitutionality by way of exception: the fate reserved for laws and regulations declared unconstitutional")
Unconstitutionality by way of exception: the fate reserved for laws and regulations declared unconstitutional29,99 €![The (In)constitutionalities of the RDC]( "The (In)constitutionalities of the RDC")
The (In)constitutionalities of the RDC26,99 €![Analysing the position of Substitute Councillor for the Courts of Auditors]( "Analysing the position of Substitute Councillor for the Courts of Auditors")
Analysing the position of Substitute Councillor for the Courts of Auditors26,99 €![Diffuse control of constitutionality and cultural heritage]( "Diffuse control of constitutionality and cultural heritage")
Diffuse control of constitutionality and cultural heritage44,99 €![Unconstitutional state of affairs as a tool for litigation]( "Unconstitutional state of affairs as a tool for litigation")
Unconstitutional state of affairs as a tool for litigation46,99 €![Judicial control of the merits of discretionary administrative acts]( "Judicial control of the merits of discretionary administrative acts")
Judicial control of the merits of discretionary administrative acts26,99 €![The Unconstitutionality of Articles of the Public Procurement Law]( "The Unconstitutionality of Articles of the Public Procurement Law")
The Unconstitutionality of Articles of the Public Procurement Law26,99 €
This paper aims to present a dogmatic model to understand the legal nature of unconstitutional norms and acts and the modulation of the effects of unconstitutionality decisions. To this end, it begins by analysing one of the traditional assumptions of the theory of law of the separation of the planes of the norm and the legal act, examining the idea of nullity of the unconstitutional norm. It then presents two different models for understanding the modulation of effects, pointing to the so-called broad model as the most appropriate for greater clarity and consistency in decision-making, in addition to respect for the quorum legally established for this measure. Finally, groups of cases from the case law of the Federal Supreme Court are examined to identify the impact of the proposed model.