Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Rethinking Community]( "Rethinking Community")
Rethinking Community69,35 €![Researching Contexts, Practices and Pedagogies in English for Academic Purposes]( "Researching Contexts, Practices and Pedagogies in English for Academic Purposes")
Researching Contexts, Practices and Pedagogies in English for Academic Purposes37,99 €![Pedagogies to Enhance Learning for Indigenous Students]( "Pedagogies to Enhance Learning for Indigenous Students")
Pedagogies to Enhance Learning for Indigenous Students74,99 €![Circulation of Academic Thought]( "Circulation of Academic Thought")
Circulation of Academic Thought48,40 €![Researching Contexts, Practices and Pedagogies in English for Academic Purposes]( "Researching Contexts, Practices and Pedagogies in English for Academic Purposes")
Researching Contexts, Practices and Pedagogies in English for Academic Purposes37,99 €![]()
"Rhetorical Structure Theory"68,00 €![Pedagogies for Internationalising Research Education]( "Pedagogies for Internationalising Research Education")
Pedagogies for Internationalising Research Education63,99 €
This book targets the intersection of two areas:
comparative research on writing instruction and
argumentative/persuasive writing pedagogies in
secondary schools. By mapping the historical context
for written argumentation instruction as a school
genre at the secondary level in the U.S. and China,
with a focus on the 20th century and thereafter, the
author identifies the hybrid nature of the school
genre shaped by complex social, theoretical, and
curricular factors. Then she compares and contrasts
the key concepts and directives for written
argumentation instruction in the textbooks. Some
focal points such as purpose, the relationship
between philosophy and rhetoric, logic, the place of
emotion, and perceptions of the writer and the
audience are compared and contrasted.
Finally the author discusses the implications of the
findings for rethinking written argumentation
instruction in the 21st century, calling for
coupling of formal logic and dialectical logic and
reconsidering the place of emotion. This book
should be useful to scholars and professionals in
intercultural communication, rhetoric and
composition, and education.
comparative research on writing instruction and
argumentative/persuasive writing pedagogies in
secondary schools. By mapping the historical context
for written argumentation instruction as a school
genre at the secondary level in the U.S. and China,
with a focus on the 20th century and thereafter, the
author identifies the hybrid nature of the school
genre shaped by complex social, theoretical, and
curricular factors. Then she compares and contrasts
the key concepts and directives for written
argumentation instruction in the textbooks. Some
focal points such as purpose, the relationship
between philosophy and rhetoric, logic, the place of
emotion, and perceptions of the writer and the
audience are compared and contrasted.
Finally the author discusses the implications of the
findings for rethinking written argumentation
instruction in the 21st century, calling for
coupling of formal logic and dialectical logic and
reconsidering the place of emotion. This book
should be useful to scholars and professionals in
intercultural communication, rhetoric and
composition, and education.