Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Philosophy and the Social Sciences]( "Philosophy and the Social Sciences")
Philosophy and the Social Sciences182,99 €![Qualitative Complexity]( "Qualitative Complexity")
Qualitative Complexity165,99 €![Critical Realism]( "Critical Realism")
Critical Realism176,99 €![Metaphysical Sociology]( "Metaphysical Sociology")
Metaphysical Sociology182,99 €![Science Studies as Naturalized Philosophy]( "Science Studies as Naturalized Philosophy")
Science Studies as Naturalized Philosophy74,99 €![Culture and Cultural Entities - Toward a New Unity of Science]( "Culture and Cultural Entities - Toward a New Unity of Science")
Culture and Cultural Entities - Toward a New Unity of Science120,99 €![Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences]( "Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences")
Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences1.205,99 €
In late nineteenth-century German academic circles, the term verstehen (literally, understanding or comprehension) came to be associated with the view that social phenomena must be understood from the point of view of the social actor. Advocates were opposed by positivists who stressed the unity of method between the social and natural sciences and an external, experimental, and quantitative knowledge. Although modified over time, the dispute has persisted and still defines many debates in the field of philosophy of social sciences. In this volume, Michael Martin offers a critical appraisal of verstehen as a method of verification and discovery as well as a necessary condition for understanding. In its strongest forms, verstehen entails subjectively reliving the experience of the social actor or at least rethinking his or her thoughts. Martin's opening chapter offers a reconsideration of the debate between the classical verstehen theorists -- Wilhelm Dilthey, Max Weber, R.G. Collingwood -- and the positivists. Chapters 2 and 3 deal with positivist critiques of verstehen as a method of social scientific verification and understanding. In the subsequent chapters, Martin considers contemporary varieties of the verstehen position and argues that they conflict with the pluralistic nature of social science. Chapter 4 discusses Peter Winch's and William Dray's variants of verstehen, while chapters 5 through 9 consider recent theorists -- Karl Popper, Charles Taylor, Clifford Geertz -- whose work can be characterized in verstehenist terms. In his conclusion Martin defines the limitations of the classical and recent verstehen positions and proposes methodological pluralism. This volume is theonly comprehensive and sustained critique of verstehen theory currently available. It will be of interest to sociologists, philosophers, political scientists, and anthropologists.