Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Remarks of Richard H. Dana, Jr., esq. before the Committee on federal relations, on the proposed removal of Edward G. Loring, esq. from the office of]( "Remarks of Richard H. Dana, Jr., esq. before the Committee on federal relations, on the proposed removal of Edward G. Loring, esq. from the office of")
Remarks of Richard H. Dana, Jr., esq. before the Committee on federal relations, on the proposed removal of Edward G. Loring, esq. from the office of16,99 €![The riparian rights of Virginia proprietors on the Potomac river.]( "The riparian rights of Virginia proprietors on the Potomac river.")
The riparian rights of Virginia proprietors on the Potomac river.16,99 €![The Rights and Wrongs of Royal Marriage: How the Law Has Led to Heartbreak, Farce and Confusion, and Why It Must Be Changed]( "The Rights and Wrongs of Royal Marriage: How the Law Has Led to Heartbreak, Farce and Confusion, and Why It Must Be Changed")
The Rights and Wrongs of Royal Marriage: How the Law Has Led to Heartbreak, Farce and Confusion, and Why It Must Be Changed16,99 €![Justices of the Peace of Colonial Virginia 1757-1775]( "Justices of the Peace of Colonial Virginia 1757-1775")
Justices of the Peace of Colonial Virginia 1757-177520,99 €![The Neutrality Laws of the United States]( "The Neutrality Laws of the United States")
The Neutrality Laws of the United States28,99 €![The amendment of the federal Constitution.]( "The amendment of the federal Constitution.")
The amendment of the federal Constitution.16,99 €![The ancient and the modern teacher of politics.]( "The ancient and the modern teacher of politics.")
The ancient and the modern teacher of politics.16,99 €
This landmark volume chronicles the history of laws banning interracial marriage in the United States with particular emphasis on the case of Richard and Mildred Loving, a white man and a black woman who were convicted by the state of Virginia of the crime of marrying across racial lines in the late 1950s. The Lovings were not activists, but their battle to live together as husband and wife in their home state instigated the 1967 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that antimiscegenation laws were unconstitutional, which ultimately resulted in the overturning of laws against interracial marriage that were still in effect in sixteen states by the late 1960s.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.