Visions of the City - Wittgenstein and Linguistic Modalities in Modernism - Robb, Thomas
27,95 €
inkl. MwSt.
Versandkostenfrei*
Versandfertig in über 4 Wochen
  • Broschiertes Buch

Master's Thesis from the year 2010 in the subject Literature - Comparative Literature, grade: 4,0, State University of New York at Buffalo, language: English, abstract: This thesis asserts that Ludwig Wittgenstein's philosophy, expressed primarily throughhis formulation of the private language argument, offers a uniquely illuminating perspective tothe works of Virginia Woolf and T.S. Eliot. The very idea of the private language argument isinherently built upon a limit. Through it, Wittgenstein poses a paradox to us: in examining thelimitations of language, it is impossible to determine what…mehr

Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
Produktbeschreibung
Master's Thesis from the year 2010 in the subject Literature - Comparative Literature, grade: 4,0, State University of New York at Buffalo, language: English, abstract: This thesis asserts that Ludwig Wittgenstein's philosophy, expressed primarily throughhis formulation of the private language argument, offers a uniquely illuminating perspective tothe works of Virginia Woolf and T.S. Eliot. The very idea of the private language argument isinherently built upon a limit. Through it, Wittgenstein poses a paradox to us: in examining thelimitations of language, it is impossible to determine what the limit is from the angle at whichlanguage no longer plays a role. In this light, language is the currency of comprehension. Inexamining the efficacy and dilemmas of language, its meaning, its use, its necessity of publicrules and one's subsequent acknowledgement of them, Wittgenstein's later work, PhilosophicalInvestigations, is employed throughout the body of this thesis. This paper argues that it is notenough to merely consider the fact that Woolf and Eliot take an ethical stance (an action-basedposition formed from their own interactions with the city of London) upon the epistemologicalproblems of private language; rather, it is more useful to assert the potency of the two authors'differing solutions to the problems of language that are found in their respective works.