Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Increasing Resilience to Climate Variability and Change]( "Increasing Resilience to Climate Variability and Change")
Increasing Resilience to Climate Variability and Change37,99 €![Reinterpreting Sub-Saharan Cities through the Concept of Adaptive Capacity]( "Reinterpreting Sub-Saharan Cities through the Concept of Adaptive Capacity")
Reinterpreting Sub-Saharan Cities through the Concept of Adaptive Capacity37,99 €![Goal and Scope Definition in Life Cycle Assessment]( "Goal and Scope Definition in Life Cycle Assessment")
Goal and Scope Definition in Life Cycle Assessment110,99 €![Irrigated Agriculture in Egypt]( "Irrigated Agriculture in Egypt")
Irrigated Agriculture in Egypt88,99 €![Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-food Sector]( "Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-food Sector")
Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-food Sector74,99 €![Indigenous Peoples¿ Governance of Land and Protected Territories in the Arctic]( "Indigenous Peoples¿ Governance of Land and Protected Territories in the Arctic")
Indigenous Peoples¿ Governance of Land and Protected Territories in the Arctic81,99 €![Environment and Health in Sub-Saharan Africa: Managing an Emerging Crisis]( "Environment and Health in Sub-Saharan Africa: Managing an Emerging Crisis")
Environment and Health in Sub-Saharan Africa: Managing an Emerging Crisis147,99 €
This book is about the process of water management decentralization in African countries, which is seen as a means of advancing river basin management at the lowest appropriate level.
There are very different stages of implementing decentralization in practice. This called for research aiming to understand the following questions: (i) why do some water agencies succeed more than others? (ii) What are the variables involved in such reform process? (iii) which variables have a positive or a negative impact on the implementation of decentralization processes? (iv) Which variables could be affected by policy interventions, and how? This study aimed to answer these questions through the following objectives: (i) analyze the factors that have potentially affected the results of decentralization process in SSA basins, and (ii) analyze the performance of decentralization process in SSA basins. Qualitative and quantitative approaches were used.
The main findings are that waterscarcity is a major stimulus to reform; water user associations, if not well prepared and trained, may deter the decentralization process; and being part of an existing treaty over an international basin helps foster the process. Conditions improving decentralization performance include: scarcity of water resources, longer period of implementation, bottom-up creation, and appropriate budgetary support.
There are very different stages of implementing decentralization in practice. This called for research aiming to understand the following questions: (i) why do some water agencies succeed more than others? (ii) What are the variables involved in such reform process? (iii) which variables have a positive or a negative impact on the implementation of decentralization processes? (iv) Which variables could be affected by policy interventions, and how? This study aimed to answer these questions through the following objectives: (i) analyze the factors that have potentially affected the results of decentralization process in SSA basins, and (ii) analyze the performance of decentralization process in SSA basins. Qualitative and quantitative approaches were used.
The main findings are that waterscarcity is a major stimulus to reform; water user associations, if not well prepared and trained, may deter the decentralization process; and being part of an existing treaty over an international basin helps foster the process. Conditions improving decentralization performance include: scarcity of water resources, longer period of implementation, bottom-up creation, and appropriate budgetary support.