132,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
Versandkostenfrei*Erscheint vorauss. 18. März 2027
Melden Sie sich
hier
hier
für den Produktalarm an, um über die Verfügbarkeit des Produkts informiert zu werden.
66 °P sammeln
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Judicial Activism in an Age of Populism]( "Judicial Activism in an Age of Populism")
Judicial Activism in an Age of Populism183,99 €![The Context of Judicial Activism]( "The Context of Judicial Activism")
The Context of Judicial Activism115,99 €![The Political Foundations of Judicial Independence in Dictatorship and Democracy]( "The Political Foundations of Judicial Independence in Dictatorship and Democracy")
The Political Foundations of Judicial Independence in Dictatorship and Democracy125,99 €![A Statement Of Reasons Against The Assumption And Exercise Of Executive And Legislative Powers By The Supreme Judicial Court]( "A Statement Of Reasons Against The Assumption And Exercise Of Executive And Legislative Powers By The Supreme Judicial Court")
A Statement Of Reasons Against The Assumption And Exercise Of Executive And Legislative Powers By The Supreme Judicial Court30,99 €![Judicial Tenure in the United States]( "Judicial Tenure in the United States")
Judicial Tenure in the United States37,99 €![Judicial Process and Judicial Policymaking]( "Judicial Process and Judicial Policymaking")
Judicial Process and Judicial Policymaking190,99 €![EU Treaties and the Judicial Politics of National Courts]( "EU Treaties and the Judicial Politics of National Courts")
EU Treaties and the Judicial Politics of National Courts227,99 €
A two-voice debate, this work offers a dispassionate discussion of the nature of judicial activism. Looking at what constitutes an "activist decision" - when a judge rules more in accordance with personal and political convictions than the law - this unique conversation delves into what exactly is judicial activism and why it is illegitimate. The two authors, one conservative and one liberal, seek to determine what is the scope of the legitimate discretion that judges have when deciding cases. After summarizing the controversy surrounding judicial activism, they look at this issue in relation to specific aspects of the law, including the use of moral principles, the purpose of the law, the interpretation of statutes, or the constitutionality of statutes. Each chapter begins with a question followed by non-polemical critiques and alternative answers. Arguments by key thinkers (Dworkin, Scalia) are also introduced and critiqued throughout the work. This balanced, non-technical treatment of a key issue in today's political debate will be an excellent introductory text for anyone studying American politics and political theory.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.