Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Unmaking of kinship. The modern technology contribute]( "Unmaking of kinship. The modern technology contribute")
Unmaking of kinship. The modern technology contribute15,95 €![What is being paid for in marriage payments?]( "What is being paid for in marriage payments?")
What is being paid for in marriage payments?15,95 €![The Fetishism to Credit Money with an Intrinsic Power to Change (¿Invert¿) Society and Culture]( "The Fetishism to Credit Money with an Intrinsic Power to Change (¿Invert¿) Society and Culture")
The Fetishism to Credit Money with an Intrinsic Power to Change (¿Invert¿) Society and Culture15,95 €![The Ethnography of the State. Special Emphasis on the Analytical Category of Resistance]( "The Ethnography of the State. Special Emphasis on the Analytical Category of Resistance")
The Ethnography of the State. Special Emphasis on the Analytical Category of Resistance15,95 €![Boarding House Preferences. Influence on the Academic Performance of College Students]( "Boarding House Preferences. Influence on the Academic Performance of College Students")
Boarding House Preferences. Influence on the Academic Performance of College Students47,95 €![Model-directed Learning. Albert Bandura¿s Social Cognitive Learning Theory and its Social-psychological Significance for School and Instruction]( "Model-directed Learning. Albert Bandura¿s Social Cognitive Learning Theory and its Social-psychological Significance for School and Instruction")
Model-directed Learning. Albert Bandura¿s Social Cognitive Learning Theory and its Social-psychological Significance for School and Instruction14,99 €![The Future of Education. Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Education]( "The Future of Education. Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Education")
The Future of Education. Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Education9,99 €
Essay from the year 2013 in the subject Pedagogy - Science, Theory, Anthropology, grade: 65, University of Cambridge, language: English, abstract: Kinship is grounded in biological facts. It is based on the undeniable, universal reality of biological rules - a child is related to two parents of different sex - and concerned about how sociological structures - who cares for the child? - map on to this. This view of kinship as the hard science of biology for a long time had ardent supporters, Morgan and Gellner among them. The exceptions - adoption for instance - that even Morgan and Gellner admitted to this rule of 'biology only' soon took got the upper hand. However, alternatives were not immediately at hand. Needham and after him Schneider argued for the death of kinship as a whole while already very early Durkheim and Rivers search for a solution in a recourse to 'social kinship'. It took another couple of decades, however, until scholars such as Bloch/Guggenheim and Clarke fully developed a repertoire for analysing social kinship in terms of for instance nurture and care. Problematic in all those accounts was merely one thing: they did not deal with the dichotomy between nature and culture, between biological and social kinship. Carstens tries to address this shortcoming with her more dynamic notion of 'relatedness' mapped onto Latourian networks. The final question, however, remains: are we really developing towards a 'hybrid idea' if kinship between biological and social relations?
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.