Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Rewriting the Rules]( "Rewriting the Rules")
Rewriting the Rules21,99 €![Philosophy of Western Music]( "Philosophy of Western Music")
Philosophy of Western Music28,99 €![Why It's OK to Trust Science]( "Why It's OK to Trust Science")
Why It's OK to Trust Science123,99 €![Why It's OK to Trust Science]( "Why It's OK to Trust Science")
Why It's OK to Trust Science19,99 €![Thinking about Stories]( "Thinking about Stories")
Thinking about Stories33,99 €![Thinking about Stories]( "Thinking about Stories")
Thinking about Stories123,99 €![The Routledge Companion to Romantic Love]( "The Routledge Companion to Romantic Love")
The Routledge Companion to Romantic Love40,99 €
The downsides of monogamy are felt by most people engaged in long-term relationships, including restrictions on self-discovery, limits on friendship, sexual boredom, and a circumscribed understanding of intimacy. Yet, a "happily ever after" monogamy is assumed to be the ideal form of romantic love in many modern societies: a relationship that is morally ideal and will bring the most happiness to its two partners.
In Why It's OK to Not Be Monogamous, Justin L. Clardy deeply questions these assumptions. He rejects the claim that non-monogamy among honest, informed and consenting adults is morally impermissible. He shows instead how polyamorous relationships can actually be exemplars of moral virtue. The book discusses how social and political forces sustain and reward monogamous relationships. The book defines non-monogamy as a privative concept; a negation of monogamy. Looking at its prevalence in the United States, the book explains how common criticisms of non-monogamy come up short. Clardy argues, as some researchers have recently shown-monogamy relies on continually demonizing non-monogamy to sustain its moral status. Finally, the book concludes with a focus on equality, asking what justice for polyamorous individuals might look like.
In Why It's OK to Not Be Monogamous, Justin L. Clardy deeply questions these assumptions. He rejects the claim that non-monogamy among honest, informed and consenting adults is morally impermissible. He shows instead how polyamorous relationships can actually be exemplars of moral virtue. The book discusses how social and political forces sustain and reward monogamous relationships. The book defines non-monogamy as a privative concept; a negation of monogamy. Looking at its prevalence in the United States, the book explains how common criticisms of non-monogamy come up short. Clardy argues, as some researchers have recently shown-monogamy relies on continually demonizing non-monogamy to sustain its moral status. Finally, the book concludes with a focus on equality, asking what justice for polyamorous individuals might look like.