15,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
Sofort per Download lieferbar
  • Format: PDF

Seminar paper from the year 2013 in the subject Politics - Region: Africa, grade: A, Université 8 Mai 1945 (Université 8 Mai 1945, Guelma), course: American civilization, language: English, abstract: The twenty first century announced more promising for the black continent as the US turned massively and determinedly to Africa. Despite previous attempts by former administrations, it was the Bush administration which showed more interest in an economically and politically distressed area for so long. In the light of the international competition over the continent’s resources, the United States…mehr

Produktbeschreibung
Seminar paper from the year 2013 in the subject Politics - Region: Africa, grade: A, Université 8 Mai 1945 (Université 8 Mai 1945, Guelma), course: American civilization, language: English, abstract: The twenty first century announced more promising for the black continent as the US turned massively and determinedly to Africa. Despite previous attempts by former administrations, it was the Bush administration which showed more interest in an economically and politically distressed area for so long. In the light of the international competition over the continent’s resources, the United States possesses clear and compelling national interests in Africa. There are vital security, economic, and humanitarian interests, including reliable long-term access to energy, shared largely by the African people and the international community. Yet, despite the rhetoric, did the Bush Administration really work to bring about a fairer and more just Africa? One of the central questions which need to be asked is to what extent did President Bush’s policy to help the African nations solidify the overall US policy? Or was his project implementation influenced largely by narrow American realpolitik perspectives thus missing the opportunity to lay the foundation for a well established Wilsonian idealism? Although George W. Bush’s administration claimed to have made major new contributions to public health, promoting development, fostering democracy and peace in Sub-Saharan Africa : aid has increased in several areas and a major AIDS initiative launched, many scholars argued that foreign aid is losing its focus on development as political priorities come to the fore. Increasingly military approaches to fighting the “Global War on Terror” in Africa and securing energy imports carries serious risks for the region. This paper will first examine the enunciated objectives and rational for the Bush’s policy project. Then, this will be followed by an assessment of the effect of these measures on the development of the continent and to which extent the rhetoric matches with reality.
Autorenporträt
The author is an Associate Professor at 8 Mai 1945 Guelma University and holds a PhD in American Studies from Manchester Metropolitan University and the University of Badji Mokhtar, Annaba. He lectures on American civilization, Anglophone literature, English language, and civilization. He has held various service positions at the department (Deputy-Head of Department in Charge of Pedagogy 2010¿2012, Manager of the Training Team in Charge of Subjects). He is currently the English Department Chair and faculty member. He has received training and research grants from Paris x, Nanterre University (France), and Jordan University, Amman (Jordan) in 2012 and 2013, respectively, and then Nanterre University again in 2014. He received a long-term research scholarship to Manchester Metropolitan University in 2015¿2016. Likewise, he is an alumnus of the Study of the US Institute (SUSI) on US foreign policy, 2017.