Virginia Aspe Armella

Aristotle and New Spain (eBook, PDF)

Übersetzer: González, Juan Carlos

• Format: PDF

Produktbeschreibung

This book is a detailed exploration of the Hispanic intellectual context and the different Aristotelian traditions that prevailed until the 16th century. Through a review and contextualization of Aristotelian thinkers and texts, it argues that a unique Aristotelian tradition was formed in New Spain.

---

Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Taylor & Francis eBooks
• Seitenzahl: 234
• Erscheinungstermin: 31. März 2025
• Englisch
• ISBN-13: 9781040337967
• Artikelnr.: 73439978

Autorenporträt

Virginia Aspe Armella is a full-time researcher at the Faculty of Philosophy at Universidad Panamericana (Mexico City). She is the author of Approaches to the Theory of Freedom in Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz (2018) and a member of the Academia Hispano Americana de Ciencias, Artes y Letras de México.

Inhaltsangabe

Introduction 1. Philosophical Antecedents: The Methodological Case for a
Novohispanic Philosophy 2. The Spanish Context and Its Influence on
Novohispanic Philosophy 3. Aristotelianism and Its Traditions 4.
Renaissance Aristotelianism 5. The Differences Between Aristotle and
Aristotelian Thomism 6. Towards the Reception of Aristotle in New Spain 7.
Understanding Novohispanic Aristotelianism: The Influence of the Posterior
Analytics on the University Curriculum 8. Alonso's Concept of the Soul and
Its Aristotelian Roots 9. Alonso's Logic and Aristotle's Organon 10.
Aristotle and Alonso's Practical Philosophy 11. Aristotle, Bartolomé de las
Casas, and Bernardino de Sahagún 12. From Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz's and
Carlos de Sigüenza y Góngora's Aristotelianism to Francisco Xavier
Clavijero's Naturalism 13. Latin American Aristotelianism and its
Philosophical Implications: Some Arguments and Their Reconstruction.
Conclusion: On Interpreting the Past