Content and Process Specificity in the Effects of Prior Experiences (eBook, PDF)

Advances in Social Cognition, Volume III
Redaktion: Srull, Thomas K; Srull, Thomas K.; Wyer Jr., Robert S.

• Format: PDF

Produktbeschreibung

In Volume 3, Eliot R. Smith of Purdue University proposes that social cognition theorists have placed excessive emphasis on the role of schemata, prototypes, and various other types of abstractions. This has affected both the methodologies they use and the type of theories they construct. What has not been adequately appreciated is the storage and retrieval of specific episodes, especially those with idiosyncratic features. This volume s designed as a required text for those studying personality, experimental and consumer psychology, cognitive science, and communications.

---

Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Taylor & Francis
• Seitenzahl: 208
• Erscheinungstermin: 2. Januar 2014
• Englisch
• ISBN-13: 9781317760160
• Artikelnr.: 40301888

Autorenporträt

Srull, Thomas K; Wyer, Jr., Robert S.; Srull, Thomas K.

Inhaltsangabe

Contents: E.R. Smith
Content and Process Specificity in the Effects of Prior Experiences. L.W. Barsalou
On the Indistinguishability of Exemplar Memory and Abstraction in Category Representation. J.N. Bassili
Cognitive Signatures and Their Forgery. D.L. Hamilton
D.M. Mackie
Specificity and Generality in the Nature and Use of Stereotypes. L.J. Jacoby
M.J. Marriott
J.G. Collins
The Specifics of Memory and Cognition. C.M. Judd
Specific Encoding Yet Abstract Retrieval of Social Categories. S.B. Klein
J. Loftus
The Role of Abstract and Exemplar-Based Knowledge in Self-Judgments: Implications for a Cognitive Model of the Self. G.D. Logan
Social Cognition Gets Specific. T.M. Ostrom
The Maturing of Social Cognition. T.K. Srull
R.S. Wyer
Jr.
Content and Process Specificity: Where Do We Go from Here? E.R. Smith
Reply to Commentaries.