Convergence Innovation in Asian Industries (eBook, PDF)

Redaktion: Lee, Kong-Rae

• Format: PDF

Produktbeschreibung

In exploring the causes, processes, and patterns of convergence innovation, this book argues that the process of convergence innovation is a continuous disequilibrium between reference technology and its matching technology. Convergence innovation has been taking place mainly by applying IT technologies to vast areas of conventional technologies, so that individuals or firms reap the benefits of this convergence. Case studies show how such innovation is made possible by convergence, and how it ultimately improves the welfare of human beings as companies solve diverse problems and increase employment. This book was published as a special issue of the Asian Journal of Technology Innovation.

---

Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Taylor & Francis
• Seitenzahl: 158
• Erscheinungstermin: 19. April 2018
• Englisch
• ISBN-13: 9781317189312
• Artikelnr.: 56840663

Inhaltsangabe

1. Toward a new paradigm of technological innovation: convergence
innovation 2. Technological convergence in Indonesian firms: cases of
biobased chemical product innovation 3. Convergence of service and
technical skills: the case of ERP implementation in Israel 4. A semantic
network analysis of technological innovation in dentistry: a case of
CAD/CAM 5. Convergence innovation of the textile machinery industry in
Korea 6. Innovation strategy and technological competence building to
provide next generation network and services through convergence - the case
of NTT in Japan 7. Convergence innovation in railway technology: how ERL of
Malaysia attained its co-evolution structure for systemic development 8. Is
the technological capability gap between Hyundai and Mitsubishi converging
or diverging? Findings from patent data analysis 9. Do latecomer firms rely
on 'recent' and 'scientific' knowledge more than incumbent firms do?
Convergence or divergence in knowledge sourcing