Criminal Law Conversations (eBook, PDF)

Redaktion: Robinson, Paul H.; Kessler Ferzan, Kimberly; Garvey, Stephen

• Format: PDF

Produktbeschreibung

Criminal Law Conversations provides an authoritative overview of contemporary criminal law debates in the United States. This collection of high caliber scholarly papers was assembled using an innovative and interactive method of nominations and commentary by the nation's top legal scholars. Virtually every leading scholar in the field has participated, resulting in a volume of interest to those both in and outside of the community. Criminal Law Conversations showcases the most captivating of these essays, and provides insight into the most fundamental and provocative questions of modern criminal law.

---

Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Oxford University Press
• Erscheinungstermin: 10. Juli 2009
• Englisch
• ISBN-13: 9780199748532
• Artikelnr.: 42620002

Autorenporträt

Paul H. Robinson is Professor of Law at the University of Pennsylvania School of Law and most recently the author of Distributive Principles of Criminal Law (OUP, 2008). Stephen Garvey is Professor of Law at Cornell University School of Law. Kimberly Kessler Ferzan is Professor of Law at Rutgers University School of Law, Camden.

Inhaltsangabe

* i. Principles
* Chapter 1. Decision Rules and Conduct Rules: On Acoustic Separation
in Criminal Law
* Meir Dan-Cohen
* Comments:
* Kyron Huigens-Duress Is Never a Conduct Rule
* Samuel W. Buell-Decision Rule as Notice: The Case of Fraud
* Anne M. Coughlin-Of Decision Rules and Conduct Rules, or Doing the
Police in Different Voices
* Luís Duarte d'Almeida-Separation, But Not of Rules
* Adil Ahmad Haque-The Constitutive Function of Criminal Law
* Eric J. Miller-Are There Two Types of Decision Rule?
* Malcolm Thorburn-A Liberal Criminal Law Cannot Be Reduced to These
Two Types of Rules
* Reply:
* Meir Dan-Cohen
* Chapter 2. Empirical Desert
* Paul H. Robinson
* Comments:
* Mary Sigler-The False Promise of Empirical Desert
* Adam J. Kolber-Compliance-Promoting Intuitions
* Michael T. Cahill-A Fertile Desert?
* Alice Ristroph-The New Desert
* Youngjae Lee-Keeping Desert Honest
* Matthew Lister-Desert: Empirical, Not Metaphysical
* Alice Ristroph-Response to Lee and Lister
* Joseph E. Kennedy-Empirical Desert and the Endpoints of Punishment
* Andrew E. Taslitz-Empirical Desert: The Yin and Yang of Criminal
Justice
* Adil Ahmad Haque-Legitimacy as Strategy
* Laura I. Appleman-Sentencing, Empirical Desert, and Restorative
Justice
* Reply:
* Paul H. Robinson
* Chapter 3. Defending Preventive Detention
* Christopher Slobogin
* Comments:
* Michael Louis Corrado-Slobogin on Dehumanization
* Michael Marcus-Don't Abandon Sentencing Reform to Defend Preventive
Detention
* Rinat Kitai-Sangero-The Presumption of Innocence versus Preventive
Detention
* Matt Matravers-Unreliability, Innocence, and Preventive Detention
* Joseph E. Kennedy-The Dangers of Dangerousness as a Basis of
Incarceration
* Reply:
* Christopher Slobogin
* Chapter 4. The Economics of Crime Control
* Doron Teichman
* Comments:
* Russell D. Covey-The Limits of the Economic Model: Becker's Crime and
Punishment
* Alon Harel-The Economic Analysis of Crime Control: A Friendly
Critique
* Keith N. Hylton-Effi cient Deterrence and Crime Control
* Morris B. Hoffman-Law, Economics, and Neuroethical Realism
* Reply:
* Doron Teichman
* Chapter 5. The Difficulties of Deterrence as a Distributive Principle
* Paul H. Robinson
* Comments:
* Russell D. Covey-Deterrence's Complexity
* Douglas A. Berman-Making Deterrence Work Better
* Doron Teichman-In Defense of Deterrence
* Jonathan S. Masur, Richard H. McAdams, and Thomas J. Miles-For
General Deterrence
* Reply:
* Paul H. Robinson
* Chapter 6. Why only the State may Inflict Criminal Sanctions: The
Case Against Privately Inflicted Sanctions
* Alon Harel
* Comments:
* Miriam Baer-Eliminating the Divide Between the State and Its Citizens
* Doron Teichman-Why the State May Delegate the Infliction of Criminal
Sanctions
* Malcolm Thorburn-Why Only the State May Decide when Sanctions Are
Appropriate
* Stuart P. Green-Why Do Privately Inflicted Criminal Sanctions Matter?
* Reply:
* Alon Harel
* Chapter 7. Results Don't Matter
* Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan
* Comments:
* Gerald Leonard-Some Reasons Why Criminal Harms Matter
* Peter Westen-Why Criminal Harms Matter
* Thomas Morawetz-Results Don't Matter, But . . .
* Jeremy Horder-On the Reducibility of Crimes
* Reply:
* Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan
* Chapter 8. Post-Modern Meditations on Punishment: On the Limits of
Reason and the Virtue of Randomization Bernard E. Harcourt
* Comments:
* Alice Ristroph-Games Punishers Play
* Michael M. O'Hear-Chance's Domain
* Alon Harel-The Lure of Ambivalent Skepticism
* Ken Levy-Punishment Must Be Justified Or Not at All
* Reply:
* Bernard E. Harcourt
* Chapter 9. Remorse, Apology, and Mercy
* Jeffrie G. Murphy
* Comments:
* Sherry F. Colb-Retaining Remorse
* Stephanos Bibas-Invasions of Conscience and Faked Apologies
* Susan Bandes-Evaluation of Remorse Is Here to Stay: We Should Focus
on Improving Its Dynamics
* Lisa Kern Griffin-Insincere and Involuntary Public Apologies
* Janet Ainsworth-The Social Meaning of Apology
* Reply:
* Jeffrie G. Murphy
* Chapter 10. Interpretive Construction in the Substantive Criminal Law
* Mark Kelman
* Comments:
* Paul Litton-Unexplained, False Assumptions Underlie Kelman's
Skepticism
* John Mikhail-Unconscious Choices in Legal Analysis
* Margaret Raymond-Interpretive Constructions and the Exercise of Bias
* Alice Ristroph-Interpretive Construction and Defensive Punishment
Theory
* Reply:
* Mark Kelman
* Chapter 11. Criminalization and Sharing Wrongs
* S.E. Marshall and R.A. Duff
* Comments:
* Stuart P. Green-Sharing Wrongs Between Criminal and Civil Sanctions
* Shlomit Wallerstein-Victim, Beware! On the Dangers of Sharing Wrongs
with Society
* Adil Ahmad Haque-Sharing the Burdens of Justice
* Matthew Lister-Contractualism and the Sharing of Wrongs
* Michelle Madden Dempsey-Sharing Reasons for Criminalization? No
Thanks . . . Already Got 'Em!
* Andrew E. Taslitz-Public versus Private Retribution and Delegated
Revenge
* Reply:
* S.E. Marshall and R.A. Duff
* Chapter 12. Monstrous Offenders and the Search for Solidarity Through
Modern Punishment
* Joseph E. Kennedy
* Comments:
* Marianne Wesson-Domesticated Monsters
* Janet Ainsworth- "We Have Met the Enemy and He Is Us ": Cognitive
Bias and Perceptions of Threats
* Douglas A. Berman-Have Good Intentions Also Fueled the Severity
Revolution?
* Reply:
* Joseph E. Kennedy
* ii. Doctrine
* Chapter 13. Against Negligence Liability
* Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan
* Comments:
* Leo Zaibert-For Negligence Liability
* Michelle Madden Dempsey-The Object of Criminal Responsibility
* Alan Brudner-Is Negligence Blameless?
* Stephen P. Garvey-Fatally Circular? Not!
* Andrew E. Taslitz-Cognitive Science and Contextual Negligence
Liability
* Kenneth W. Simons-The Distinction Between Negligence and Recklessness
Is Unstable
* Reply:
* Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan
* Chapter 14. Rape Law Reform Based on Negotiation: Beyond the No and
Yes Models
* Michelle J. Anderson
* Comments:
* Andrew E. Taslitz-Self-Deception and Rape Law Reform
* Kimberly Kessler Ferzan-Sex as Contract
* Robin Charlow-Negotiating Sex: Would It Work?
* Sherry F. Colb-Conversation Before Penetration?
* Marianne Wesson-You Can't Get Away from Consent
* Reply:
* Michelle J. Anderson
* Chapter 15. Provocation: Explaining and Justifying the Defense in
Partial Excuse, Loss of Self-Control Terms
* Joshua Dressler
* Comments:
* Susan D. Rozelle-He Had It Coming: Provocation as a Partial
Justification
* Vera Bergelson-Provocation: Not Just a Partial Excuse
* Marcia Baron-Reframing the Issues: Differing Views of Justification
and the Feminist Critique of Provocation
* Joan H. Krause-Tolerating the Loss of Self-Control
* Kenneth Simons-Excuse Doctrine Should Eschew Both the Reasonable and
the Ordinary Person
* Stephen P. Garvey-Get Rid of Adequate Provocation!
* Marianne Wesson-Enforcing Virtue with the Law of Homicide
* Reply:
* Joshua Dressler
* Chapter 16. Objective Versus Subjective Justifi cation: A Case Study
in Function and Form in Constructing a System of Criminal Law Theory
* Paul H. Robinson
* Comments:
* Peter Westen-A Platonic Justification for "Unknowing Justification "
* Shlomit Wallerstein-The Third, Combined, Theory for Justifications
* Mitchell N. Berman-In Defense of Subjective Justifications
* John Mikhail-Constraining the Necessity Defense
* Reply:
* Paul H. Robinson 361
* Chapter 17. Self-Defense and the Psychotic Aggressor
* George P. Fletcher and Luis E. Chiesa
* Comments:
* Boaz Sangero- "Self-Defense and the Psychotic Aggressor ": What About
Proportionality?
* John Mikhail-Self-Defense Against Wrongful Attack: The Case of the
Psychotic Aggressor
* Sherry F. Colb-Justifying Homicide Against Innocent Aggressors
Without Denying Their Innocence
* Shlomit Wallerstein-Two Flaws in the Autonomy-Based Justification for
Self-Defense
* Whitley R.P. Kaufman-Problems for the Autonomy Theory of Self-Defense
* Reply:
* George P. Fletcher and Luis E. Chiesa
* Chapter 18. Self-Defense Against Morally Innocent Threats
* Jeff McMahan
* Comments:
* Adil Ahmad Haque-Rights and Liabilities at War
* Shlomit Wallerstein-Why Causal Responsibility Matters
* Kimberly Kessler Ferzan-Can't Sue; Can't Kill
* Whitley R.P. Kaufman-Can "Moral Responsibility " Explain
Self-Defense?
* Victor Tadros-Doubts About the Responsibility Principle
* Reply:
* Jeff McMahan
* Chapter 19. Self- Defense, Imminence, and the Battered Woman
* Whitley R.P. Kaufman
* Comments:
* Gideon Yaffe-The Real Link Between Imminence and Necessity
* Marcia Baron-In Defense of the Proxy Thesis
* Kimberly Kessler Ferzan-The Values and Costs of Imminence
* Joan H. Krause-Imminence Reconsidered: Are Battered Women Different?
* Jeremy Horder-The "Imminence " Requirement, Battered Women, and the
Authority to Strike Back
* Reply:
* Whitley Kaufman
* Chapter 20. Reasonable Provocation and Self-Defense: Recognizing the
Distinction Between Act Reasonableness and Emotion Reasonableness
* Cynthia Lee
* Comments:
* Susan D. Rozelle-Making Waves: Radicalizing Act Reasonableness
* Carissa Byrne Hessick-Is an Act Reasonableness Inquiry Necessary?
* Terry A. Maroney-Differentiating Cognitive and Volitional Aspects of
Emotion in Self-Defense and Provocation
* Caroline Forell-Norms, Proportionality, Provocation, and Imperfect
Self-Defense
* Jeremy Horder-Different Ways to Manifest Reasonableness
* Kenneth W. Simons-Requiring Reasonable Beliefs About Self-Defense
Ensures that Acts Conforming to Those Beliefs Are Reasonable
* Reply:
* Cynthia Lee
* Chapter 21. Against Control Tests for Criminal Responsibility
* Stephen J. Morse
* Comments:
* Stephen P. Garvey-The Folk Psychology of Self-Control
* Michael Louis Corrado-Morse on Control Tests
* Susan D. Rozelle-Sometimes a Control Test Is Just a Control Test
* Terry A. Maroney-Why Is a Folk-Psychological Account of Loss of
Control Necessary (And What Precisely Is It)?
* Robert F. Schopp-Cognition, Rationality, and Responsibility
* Reply:
* Stephen J. Morse
* Chapter 22. Abolition of the Insanity Defense
* Christopher Slobogin
* Comments:
* Susan D. Rozelle-No Excuse for You
* Sherry F. Colb-Not By Cognition Alone
* Paul Litton-Against Integrationism
* Matt Matravers-Justifying Defenses
* Reply:
* Christopher Slobogin
* Chapter 23. Entrapment and the "Free Market " for Crime
* Louis Michael Seidman
* Comments:
* Sherry F. Colb-Making Sense of Entrapment Law After the Death of
Lochner
* Miriam Baer-Entrapment and the Quandary of the Undercover
Investigation
* Bruce Hay-An Enforcement Policy Perspective on Entrapment
* Richard H. McAdams-The Entrapment Defense Defended
* Reply:
* Louis Michael Seidman
* iii. Administration
* Chapter 24. The Political Economy of Criminal Law and Procedure: The
Pessimists' View
* Richard H. McAdams
* Comments:
* Darryl K. Brown-The Enduring Pattern of Broad Criminal Codes and a
Path for Structural Change
* Samuel W. Buell-The Sources of Overbreadth
* Joseph E. Kennedy-Why Here and Why Now? Bringing History and
Sociology to Bear on Punitive Pathology
* Andrew E. Taslitz-The Political Economy of Prosecutorial Indiscretion
* Rachel E. Barkow-An Ounce of Prevention: Realistic Treatment for Our
Pathological Politics
* Ronald F. Wright-Prosecutor Elections and Overdepth in Criminal Codes
* Reply:
* Richard H. McAdams
* Chapter 25. Against Jury Nullification
* Andrew D. Leipold
* Comments:
* Richard H. McAdams-Jury Nullification Checks Prosecutorial Power
* Carol S. Steiker-Sculpting the Shape of Nullification Through Jury
Information and Instruction
* Sherry F. Colb-Jury Nullification and Erroneous Acquittals: Getting
the Causation Backwards
* Josh Bowers-Accuracy and Legitimacy
* Reply:
* Andrew D. Leipold
* Chapter 26. Race-Based Jury Nullification: Black Power in the
Criminal Justice System
* Paul Butler
* Comments:
* Lawrence Rosenthal-Confusing Cause and Effect
* Robin Charlow-The Effect of Race-Based Jury Nullification on Baston
* LaJuana Davis-The Pernicious Myth of Racial Jury Nullification
* Sherry F. Colb-Rejecting Racial Jury Nullification
* Bennett Capers-On Racially Based Jury Nullification
* Josh Bowers-Grand-Jury Nullification: Black Power in the Charging
Decision
* Reply:
* Paul Butler
* Chapter 27. In Support of Restorative Justice
* Erik Luna
* Comments:
* Stephanos Bibas-Restoration, But Also More Justice
* David Donlinko-Restorative Caveats
* Margareth Etienne-Restoring Justice Through Individualized Processes
* Joseph E. Kennedy-Restore to What? Supplementing Restorative Justice
* Michael M. O'Hear-Dangers of the Big Tent
* Robert Weisberg-Luna-Inspired Speculations on Restorative Justice
* Reply:
* Erik Luna
* Chapter 28. The Virtues of Offense/Offender Distinctions
* Douglas A. Berman
* Comments:
* Richard E. Myers II-From Each According to His Ability
* Adam J. Kolber-Characteristics Related to Punishment Experience
* Nancy Gertner-Offense/Offender Distinction and Competence
* Laura I. Appleman-Splitting the Baby: The Danger of Distinguishing
Between Offense and Offender Characteristics
* Joseph E. Kennedy- Blakely, Booker, Accountability, and
Intelligibility
* Margareth Etienne-In Need of a Theory of Mitigation
* Reply:
* Douglas A. Berman
* Chapter 29. The Heart has its Reasons: Examining the Strange
Persistence of the American Death Penalty
* Susan A. Bandes
* Comments:
* Douglas A. Berman and Stephanos Bibas-The Heart Has Its Value: The
Death Penalty's Justifi able Persistence
* Mary Sigler-Emotions, Retributivism and the Death Penalty
* Jeffrie G. Murphy-When Clearly Understood, Retributive Theory Has
Much To Offer
* Robert F. Schopp-Reason and Emotion in Capital Sentencing
* Joseph E. Kennedy-Outrage versus Anger and Hatred
* Carol S. Steiker-Will Empathy Kill the Death Penalty, or Vice Versa?
* LaJuana Davis-Overriding Emotion
* Terry A. Maroney-Can the Theory and Practice of Capital Punishment Be
More Emotionally Intelligent?
* Reply:
* Susan A. Bandes
* Chapter 30. Mercy's Decline and Administrative Law's Ascendance
* Rachel E. Barkow
* Comments:
* Ronald F. Wright and Marc L. Miller-Subjective and Objective
Discretion of Prosecutors
* Douglas A. Berman-Mercy's Disguise, Prosecutorial Power, and
Equality's Modern Construction
* Stephanos Bibas-Political versus Administrative Justice
* Andrew E. Taslitz-The Decline of Criminal Law Representative Populism
* Reply:
* Rachel E. Barkow
* Chapter 31. Criminal Law Comes Home
* Jeannie Suk
* Comments:
* Melissa Murray-The Private Life of Criminal Law
* Laura A. Rosenbury-Whose Privacy?
* Aya Gruber-From Neoliberalism to Libertarianism: Why Neither
Criminalization Nor Privacy Is the
* Answer for Battered Women
* Jennifer Collins-Criminal Law Comes Home to a Family
* Cheryl Hanna-Because Breaking Up Is Hard To Do
* Emily J. Sack-The Crime of Domestic Violence
* Deborah Tuerkheimer-Domesticating Criminal Law: A Normative Defense
* Alafair Burke-Domestic Violence Misdemeanor Prosecutions and the New
Policing
* Reply:
* Jeannie Suk