Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review (eBook, ePUB)

Redaktion: Davis, Fergal F.

• Format: ePub

Produktbeschreibung

Is judicial review an effective and appropriate way to regulate counter-terrorism measures? Some argue that the judiciary is ill-equipped to examine such measures, for instance because they lack the expertise of the institutions which bring them about under exigent conditions. Others claim that subjecting counter-terrorism measures to judicial review is crucial for maintaining a jurisdiction's principles of constitutionalism. This volume brings together voices from all sides of the debate from a broad range of jurisdictions, from North America, Europe and Australasia. It does not attempt to 'resolve' the argument but rather to explore it in all its dimensions. The debates are essentially concerned with fundamental questions of organising and making accountable the exercise of power in a particularly challenging environment. The book is necessary reading for all those concerned with counter-terrorism, but also with broader public law, constitutional law and administrative law principles.

---

Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Cambridge University Press
• Erscheinungstermin: 2. Oktober 2014
• Englisch
• ISBN-13: 9781316054444
• Artikelnr.: 49268274

Inhaltsangabe

List of contributors; Acknowledgements; Introduction. Counter-terrorism
judicial review: beyond dichotomies Fergal F. Davis and Fiona de Londras;
Part I. Judging Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review: 1. Counter-terrorism
judicial review as regulatory constitutionalism Fiona de Londras; 2.
Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary Jens
Elo Rytter; 3. When good cases go bad: unintended consequences of
rights-friendly judgments David Jenkins; 4. The rhetoric and reality of
judicial review of counter-terrorism actions: the United States experience
Jules Lobel; Part II. Beyond Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review: 5.
Emergency law as administrative law Mark Tushnet; 6. The politics of
counter-terrorism judicial review: creating effective parliamentary
scrutiny Fergal F. Davis; 7. Independent reviewers as alternative: an
empirical study from Australia and the United Kingdom Jessie Blackbourn; 8.
Public inquiries as an attempt to fill accountability gaps left by judicial
and legislative review Kent Roach; Part III. Counter-Terrorism Judicial
Review in the Political Constitution: 9. Rebalancing the unbalanced
constitution: juridification and national security in the United Kingdom
Roger Masterman; 10. Business as usual: deference in counter-terrorism
rights review Cora Chan; 11. Deference and dialogue in the real-world
counter-terrorism context Gavin Phillipson; Part IV. Internationalised
Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review: 12. Counter-terrorism law and judicial
review: the challenge for the Court of Justice of the European Union Cian
C. Murphy; 13. Post 9/11 UK counter-terrorism cases in the European Court
of Human Rights: a 'dialogic' approach to rights' protection or appeasement
of national authorities? Helen Fenwick; 14. Accountability for
counter-terrorism: challenges and potential in the role of the courts Helen
Duffy; Index.