Bo Mou

Cross-Tradition Engagement in Philosophy (eBook, PDF)

A Constructive-Engagement Account

• Format: PDF

Produktbeschreibung

This book presents an account of how cross-tradition engagement in philosophy is possible. This account, by way of reflective criticism, argumentation, and methodological guiding principles, inquires into how different philosophical traditions can learn from each other and make joint contributions to contemporary philosophy.

---

Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Taylor & Francis
• Seitenzahl: 446
• Erscheinungstermin: 8. April 2020
• Englisch
• ISBN-13: 9781000064421
• Artikelnr.: 59165208

Autorenporträt

Bo Mou is Professor of Philosophy at San Jose State University, USA. He is the author of Substantive Perspectivism (2009) and Semantic-Truth Approaches in Chinese Philosophy: A Unifying Pluralist Account (2019) and the contributing editor of History of Chinese Philosophy (2009) and Philosophy of Language, Chinese Language, Chinese Philosophy (2018).

Inhaltsangabe

Introduction
Part I. Theoretic Foundations: How Cross-Tradition Engagement is Possible
Chapter 1. Normative Bases for Engagement
Chapter 2. The Issue of Incommensurability
Chapter 3. The Issue of Philosophical Interpretation
Part II. Case Analyses
Chapter 4. Yin-Yang and Hegelian Models of How to Look at Contraries: An
Overall-Complementarity-Seeking Account
Chapter 5. Confucius' and Socrates' Distinct Perspectives in Treating Issue
of Filial-Piety Virtue
Chapter 6. Daoist Approach to the Issue of Being in Engaging with Quinean
and Heideggerian Approaches
Chapter 7. Zhuang Zi's and Quine's Naturalist Approaches to Epistemology
Chapter 8. Gongson Long's Treatment of "White-Horse-Not-Horse" Thesis in
Engaging with Fregran and Kripkean Approaches to the Issue of Reference
Chapter 9. Later Mohist Approach and Modern Logic Resources in Treating
Logical Inferences
Conclusion. Toward Constructively Engaging